attorney-client privilege in the terms of evan corcoran in the documents case. in this case, can you voluntary cooperate against your own client? well, a lot of it, they are looking at for rudy giuliani, is not legal advice. in fact, the white house counsel s office told him this whole fake electors scheme is blatantly illegal. you re talking outside the purview it s not legal advice and what they were actually doing with in gauging in a political strategy to try and overturn the election. there s ample evidence of that. when rudy giuliani had his law license suspended, the 33-page opinion go through a litany of all the false statements that rudy giuliani went into that were factually false and that he knew to be false, claiming there were dead voters, that they were on registered voters, non-citizens. all of it nonsense. the pressure campaign for the state officials, all things that rudy giuliani acknowledged were not legal, but he is going to give it a girl.
what they were actually doing with in gauging in a political strategy to try and overturn the election. there s ample evidence of that. when rudy giuliani had his law license suspended, the 33-page opinion go through a litany of all the false statements that rudy giuliani went into that were factually false and that he knew to be false, claiming there were dead voters, that they were on registered voters, non-citizens. all of it nonsense. the pressure campaign for the state officials, all things that rudy giuliani acknowledged were not legal, but he is going to give it a girl. so i don t think attorney-client privilege is going to save or shame donald trump in the circumstance. it s just blatant fraud, blatant, an attempt to defraud the united states. can i add one thing there? the other thing about rudy giuliani and his conversations with donald trump or privileged doesn t come in is obviously where somebody was not within the scope of that privilege is not just stating the
government is investigating the extent to which games were played, and there was obstruction and keeping the documents from them. and i think that s a serious potential case . i think they probably have some very good evidence there. one of trump s attorneys has dismissed the possibility of the former president facing obstruction charges, calling it nonsense overseas. now pope francis presiding over easter services for tens of thousands in st peter s square, the pontiff, who was hospitalized with bronchitis more than a week ago, prayed for both the people of ukraine and russia and called on the international community to work to resolve the conflict. francis also made an appeal for peace in the middle east. after a wave of escalating violence. here s a b cs marcus more reporting in tonight from the vatican. tonight pope francis leading eastern mass. before a crowd of 100,000 after a recent hospital stay sparked fears about his health. the pope expressing deep concern over the middle ea
face. but, it has not stoppe as in fact i have think it has made a stronger and more committed to the process trump has also had a record of attacking women. he calls stormy daniels horse fac throughout the hush mone investigation. trump also has long nickname for new york attorney general letitia james calling her peekaboo, a raging maniac, a leftist nut job. and now we just celebrated women s history month. and i know you are committed t elevating female journalists specifically women of color. how should we be responding to trump s boorish behavior well, we have, fortunatel for the american urban radio networks, we have the suppor of black community and fai minded people everywhere. which, is a larger number than an other group. by the way. so, w don t really subscribe t nonsense. we just do our work, and elevate our people, elevat
royal family were somehow racist? no! sean: i don t believe it, either. not only is it nonsense, but you may have noticed, in his promotional tour for his ghastly book, spare me, as i renamed it, they said, we didn t say that they were racist. he came out recently and he said they didn t mean to imply the royal family are racist. yes, you did. we watched you on oprah winfrey prayed he said they were racist prayed he would name which one of them it was. now they said they never meant to say that. i never believed at the time. that s why on good morning britain that morning i cannot defending the royal family. i said i don t believe this stuff. they claimed the archbishop of canterbury had them secretly married three days before the wedding we saw on tv. had the archbishop of canterbury done that, it would have been an illegal act and he would have been in prison. this is the church of the u.k. all of that was a complete and utter nonsense. sean: is their reconciliation, or