this aggression with a strict and forceful response and that is what we are doing. forceful response and that is what we are doing- forceful response and that is what we are doing. russia will be top of the agenda we are doing. russia will be top of the agenda at we are doing. russia will be top of the agenda at the we are doing. russia will be top of the agenda at the nato we are doing. russia will be top of the agenda at the nato summit. we are doing. russia will be top of i the agenda at the nato summit next week. what are you hoping that meeting will achieve? me week. what are you hoping that meeting will achieve? week. what are you hoping that meeting will achieve? we are very ho eful meeting will achieve? we are very hopeful that meeting will achieve? we are very hopeful that next meeting will achieve? we are very hopeful that next week meeting will achieve? we are very hopeful that next week it - meeting will achieve? we are very hopeful that next week it will -
were a couple had to choose a site? i think they were a couple of had to choose a site? i think they were a couple of things. - had to choose a site? i think they were a couple of things. i - had to choose a site? i think they were a couple of things. i think . were a couple of things. i think first about choosing a side had never really serve my community well, so, yes, i came from a unionist back and in many days would say, should it unionist were in a much more positive position, but i grew up in a terraced house, two up, two down, outside toilet, very little progress in our community. the whole thing was from politicians that they could rely on getting your support, but they didn t really have to do much in return. and to suppose my first experience when i was at university, i approach my then mp peter robertson and i asked for his help with an issue, a financial issue, and i didn t get any response. and ijust thought, what is the point of politics of people out there to help wh
some of them were new monies as well. so we need to get those folks in front of us that were in that secret it meeting, the folks that signed the letters that allowed the national media to start, you know, pushing down existence people like tom cotton and myself, people who thought all i long this came from the laboratory in wuhan. and i ll guarantee you that jim jordan and jamie cohard and rand paul are like bulldogs, they re going to grab ahold of someone s seat, and we re not letting go until we get to the truth. maria: we have some of these e-mails to show, these are e-mails back and forth between fauci and collins saying we ve got to change the subject, we ve got to, you know, kill this narrative that it came from a lab. and then over the following two years, $3 billion in grant money transact? you ve got to explan this to me explain this to me because i know some of the e-mails that we see are all redacted. are you getting what you need? and i know you re coming out with an op-
the president s schedule this morning, he ended up going in an unscheduled stop, previously unannounced from the white house, to the meeting between the secretary of state, anthony blinken, secretary of defense, lloyd austin, and their ukrainian counterparts. that meeting has been going on for over an hour now. we don t have confirmation of whether it has wrapped or not, the pool got pushed out of that it meeting. the president later on will meet with polish president duda, he s also going to be meeting with ukrainian refugees. national security adviser jake sullivan confirmed reports the white house has assembled a team known as the tiger team to form contingency plans in case russia strikes nato territory or uses chem chemical or biological weapons that could potentially drift into nato territory if russia used them in ukraine. listen. we are doing contingency planning for the possibility that russia chooses to strike
are unlikely to be the last. but analyst says this weeks discoveries are unlikely to be the last.- are unlikely to be the last. but we have seen in are unlikely to be the last. but we have seen in bucha are unlikely to be the last. but we have seen in bucha is are unlikely to be the last. but we have seen in bucha is not - are unlikely to be the last. but we have seen in bucha is not an i have seen in bucha is not an isolated incident. it falls into a pattern of behaviour which is consistent with anti partisan warfare and operations that the russian military has conducted in a number of conflicts in the past. and essentially, it is aimed at terrorising the population in response to insurgents or resistance fighters operating from their communities and so, the intent is to make the population pair collective price for sustaining systems. the ima . es of price for sustaining systems. the images of dead civilians in the streets have been strongly condemned. next, this is the uk fore