champions, they are out. forward, what tactics should england use? we forward, what tactics should engiand use? forward, what tactics should england use? forward, what tactics should england use? we are in such a aood england use? we are in such a good position. england use? we are in such a good position, 12 england use? we are in such a good position, 12 goals - england use? we are in such a good position, 12 goals which i good position, 12 goals which is great for a tournament thus far and from eight different place, southgate has a lessor of great players to choose from and it isn t going to get better because i think we re going to make it all the way to the final. i going to make it all the way to the final. ., going to make it all the way to the final. . ., the final. i am loving the positivity- the final. i am loving the positivity. now, - the final. i am loving the positivity. now, england| the final. i am loving the - positivity. now, england will be playing france on
in january and then they will play for full approval by april. then the big question is going to be what happens when you roll it out in the real world? does that one point difference actually translate into something meaningful for patients and families? some might argue that it may, right? giving somebody one more month, two more months, those are precious time periods where a person can function, where you can be with them, where they can recognize you. but we are also going to have to see what happens in the real world. those patients in the real world are different from clinical trials. they have other medical issues, they are on different medications, they are not followed as closely. in addition, it may be costly. john, we know that with we know with the drug it was about $28,000 a year in cost. patients have to come in for these infusions. and it s hard to know what this is going to mean, again, it could be an individualized decision. i think big picture, we talked about this
working on broadway. thank you forjoining us on the programme. is this verdict a surprise to me? it programme. is this verdict a surprise to me? surprise to me? it may be a surprise surprise to me? it may be a surprise it surprise to me? it may be a surprise it may surprise to me? it may be a surprise it may not - surprise to me? it may be a surprise it may not be. - surprise to me? it may be a surprise it may not be. it i surprise to me? it may be a. surprise it may not be. it was a case of two people telling a very different story. the jury decided in less than 90 minutes it was a swift decision for them, described by kevin spacey s lawyer as quick and decisive. to recap the allegations made by anthony rapp who is also an actor, he was 14 at the time, he says when he was invited to a party at kevin spacey apartment and thatis at kevin spacey apartment and that is where he alleged that this sexual assault happened. he was appearing only to just beginning his broadway career at
the it may than he was a witness for this affidavit, of course, parts of that were redacted and we don t know. but at any trial, having a witness like this could be critically important. for a couple things, one is it s tends to demonstrate donald trump s knowledge and intent. asking him to say that everything had been returned and also that donald trump himself packed the boxes demonstrates that he would know what was inside. it s going to be very difficult for donald trump to say i left this all to aides. i had no idea what was in there. maybe it s on them. but it s most certainly not on me. the other thing is significant about this is if donald trump was urging someone to make statements he knew was false, that could also be evidence to bolster that claim of obstruction of justice. so really important development. maybe this is not new to the justice department but it is new to the public. a good point there about how this could impact both the intent and the idea of obstruction f
a happy ending. remember, the angle was warning you in march about the risks of a biden proxy war because history shows that the longer a war lasts, the more costly it is . us policymakers have to be very careful to make sure we do not end up in a worse position when this is all over. but the american people must be told that the risks of escalating things with russia are not negligible. it may, in fact, draw us even closer to a direct confrontation with russia, which, as we all know, is a nuclear power. and today we inch closer to the nuclear cliff, deep within those who try to blackmail us with nuclear weapons should know that the prevailing winds can also blow in their direction if the territory integrity of our country is threatened, we will without doubt use all available means to protect russia and our people. this is not a bluff. now, amazingly, secretary austin and general mark milley,