fact the synopsis says it s a love letter to journalists, and frankly journalist need a little bit of that. . , journalist need a little bit of that. ., , ., journalist need a little bit of that. ., , ., ., ., , that. that s one of the reasons what s getting that. that s one of the reasons what s getting such that. that s one of the reasons what s getting such good - that. that s one of the reasons i what s getting such good reviews because those reviews are written journalists. because those reviews are written “ournalists. ., because those reviews are written journalists- because those reviews are written journalists. doon, - because those reviews are written journalists. doon, have journalists. you cynic. doon, have ou read journalists. you cynic. doon, have you read dune? journalists. you cynic. doon, have you read dune? this journalists. you cynic. doon, have you read dune? this is journalists. you cynic. doon, have you read dune? this is the - you read dune? t
whole thing makes sense which is astonishing because the david lynch version makes absently no sense whatsoever. version makes absently no sense whatsoever- whatsoever. that s david lynch thou . h, whatsoever. that s david lynch thou~h, i whatsoever. that s david lynch though. i bet. whatsoever. that s david lynch though, i bet. i whatsoever. that s david lynch though, i bet. ithink whatsoever. that s david lynch though, i bet. i think he - whatsoever. that s david lynch though, i bet. i think he tried l whatsoever. that s david lynch| though, i bet. i think he tried to make it make though, i bet. i think he tried to make it make sense though, i bet. i think he tried to make it make sense and - make it make sense and you discovered what denis villeneuve it did. which is you cannot do the book in one film come you have to break it in two. dune this is pretty spectacular and even if you had not read the book he would so find much to enjoy. and the giant worms are really impressi
rowe rodeo with this. we know she tampered with editing things before. you don t take things out of, you know, the realm of the context. so maybe her past set of glitches or whatever, gaps were based on what she thought it needed to say. the news, the facts don t need interpretation unless they are words that we don t often use. like when we hear supreme court language and somebody breaks that down and says this is what that means. you don t have have to omit stuff you can actually use more language to make it make sense. after ginsberg s interview, if she wanted to on set or wherever she presented that i think it was online, yahoo, whatever, she could simply have said you know we got into a di deeper discussion about this and these are some other things she told me. but she didn t do that. no. she made it play like she was in control of what the message
tweet us your 60 second or less video question about politics, policy, or current events. post it on twitter using the hashtag cross connection, or if you don t want to be out there like that on twitter, you can send us a video via email to cross connection at nbc uni.com. together, we will try to make it make sense. don t go anywhere because, coming up, it s about to be a wrap for those unemployment benefits and this is going to affect millions, plus the flooding and fires, how climate change is taking a disastrous toll on us all, and much, much more. that s all coming up in the next hour of cross connection. stay with us. i ll see you on the other side of the break. for drug free relief vicks sinex. instantly clear everyday congestion. and try vicks sinex children s saline. safe and gentle relief for children s noses. (vo) at t-mobile for business, unconventional thinking means we see things differently,
welcome back. and you already know, it is time to make it make sense. hi, tiffany. every question today. if everyday citizens get arrested for ignoring a court-ordered subpoena, why aren t ex-presidents or senate and is there any recourse for making them comply? talk about it, michael. i assume you re talking about the january 6th committee, which is trying to figure out exactly what happened that day and whether any members of congress, trump officials, or even trump himself were involved in the storming of the capitol. now, republicans in congress have been, as you know, just a bit uncooperative so far. and there has been no indication that they ll suddenly open up and share what they know with the committee. but some of those republicans are material witnesses in the investigation, like, for instance, jim jordan, who has repeatedly suggested that he