spur the justice department to launch a criminal case. nobody wants an organized crime prosecution where the d.o.j. lawyers or prosecutors go after foot soldiers and lieutenants but don t go after the people that are ordering the crimes and putting all of the criminal events into motion. so, i agree with that. you know, i think that as a matter of justice it is just wrong to punish the people that are seduced by a criminal mastermind but not the mastermind himself or herself. the hearing provided this jaw-dropping account of just how much danger vice president s secret service detail thought that they were in. members of the v.p. detail were starting to fear for their own lives. there was a lot of yelling. there was a lot of very personal calls over the radio. it was disturbing. i don t like to talk about it. there were calls to say good-bye to family members, so on and so forth. for whatever the reason was on the ground, the v.p. detail thought it was about to get very
normally do it, by hash tagging it. white now they re protesting a nazi-owned tattoo shop. i say allegedly nazi-owned tattoo shop. i don t want to get sued by nazis. what can i do? now that s a question i hear a lot from people in my travels during these hectic times. but if i m honest, it s really a question that i mostly hear from white people. specifically well-meaning, white liberal people. black people don t ask what we can do to help. in our who are we ve always had to figure out how to make the world a better place while figuring out how to make it through the day. some people are starting to realize, no, things are pretty f d. those white people have taken to protesting, hash tagging, phone banking, and a little crocheting. but some white people are second amendmenting. specifically these white people. not to be confused with these white people. i know, it s confusing. these white people are the redneck revolt. this aren t a bunch of rednecks revolting against e
investigation has revealed evidence that mr. cipollone repeatedly raised other and legal concerns about president trump s activities of january 6th and while the select committee appreciates mr. cipollone s earlier informal engagement with our investigation, with the ball now squarely in cipollone s quote the new york times is out with some important reporting, quote, the subpoena of a white house counsel a rare step for a congressional committee sent a clear signal of the aggressive tactics the panel is willing to use to force the cooperation of the white house top lawyer who could likely invoke attorney-client privilege in response to many questions. the committee has at times used the leverage of a subpoena or the leverage it creates to force witnesses to negotiate a deal for their cooperation. discussions about the scope of a possible appearance are expected to begin soon. lawyer familiar with cipollone s deliberations who was not authorized to speak on the record said th
specifically meaning white liberal people. black people don t ask for a way to help, we always ask for a better place while also asking for a way to make it through the day. some white people are starting to realize, no, things are pretty f d, and those have taken to protesting, hashtaging, and a little but some white people are second amendmenting. specifically these white people, not to be confused with these white people. these are the red neck revolt. they re actually red necks revolting against the red necks who are revolting against equal. i ll explain. the red neck revolt was founded in 2009 in kansas and colorado as an armed community of defense, which means these people are exercising their second amendment rights so they can protect their neighborhoods for neo-nazis and whatever the [ bleep ] this guy s got going on. the at right is described by the southern poverty law center as a community who believes white identity is under attack. i have no idea what they re
very well could be next. he also went further ripping the republican party as, quote, petty and extreme. saying it is, quote, coward by trump. well, he is obviously angry with senate republicans. all of whom, blocked voted to block the women s health protec protection act this afternoon. this is the bill that would he ensure roe s protections. the president vowing, quote, we will continue to defend women s constitutional rights to make private reproductive choices as recognizes in roe v. wade. and my administration will continue to explore the measures and toll tools at our disposal to do just that. look, tonight, it is immediate knot immediate apparent what those tools and measures oob could be. a democratic-controlled congress seemed to have nowhere close to 60 votes. in fact, they didn t even get 50. and while the president does blame republican, keep in mind a member of his own party did side with gop because he believes the bill went way beyond keeping the status quo.