that was the scene in kansas after resounding victory for abortion rights at the polls. kansans voted overwhelmingly to protect the right to an abortion in the constitution. not only was the result surprising in a state s conservative as kansas but, the margin wasn t even close. kansas voters rejected the anti-abortion measure by nearly 20 points and what s remarkable about the outcome is that kansas republicans did everything they possibly could to stack the deck in their favor. for starters, they scheduled the vote during a typically low turnout august primary instead of during the general election in november, because yesterday s primary focused mostly republican candidates running against each other and would presumably attract mostly republican voters. they made the language of the ballot measures so dense and confusing that the normal person would be hard-pressed to decipher at first glance what s a yes or a no vote even meant. republican groups even blasted out a barra
for starters, they scheduled the vote during a typically low turnout august primary instead of during the general election in november, because yesterday s primary focused mostly republican candidates running against each other and would presumably attract mostly republican voters. they made the language of the ballot measures so dense and confusing that the normal person would be hard-pressed to decipher at first glance what s a yes or a no vote even meant. republican groups even blasted out a barrage of misleading text messages to kansas voters the day before the vote that made it sound like voting yes would protect a woman s right to choose when in fact the opposite is true. but despite all those obstacles, voter turnout was massive, far from the usual trickle of voters for an august primary in a midterm here. turnout approached nearly presidential levels. and the votes to defeat the antiabortion measure didn t just come from the urban and suburban counties where most of
lionel messi. who had an extraordinary match to win that game against france, play is when you described as a true champion. a veteran player. he now looks like he s about touchdown at the moment. this, return this, welcome will be as much for him is this for the entire, team given the world that he has played in securing the world cup. they ve been celebrating in argentina, since that win over the weekend. isn t it a few days here with blue and white plagues in festivities on the streets of buenos aires, as well as other cities across argentina. across on america for this moment in history, with argentina when he met world cup defeating france in a historic game. one of the best teams out of the world cup has ever seen. one of the finals. some people described. and of course, the french team. welcome in the 2nd. places trump era emigration policy known as title 42 will stay in place for now. supreme court assist on roberts has sent it-ization to allow
precedent. the supreme court has now made a decision painted by an extreme president and senate leadership that they have made it-ization that they are going to strip those rights away. they re gonna take those freedoms away in everything that people were lying on has the backbone to maintaining their freedoms in this country. i think what we are going to see is that law these elections in november are not all of them are not going to be clear cut ballot issues and ballot questions what it is going to be though is that clear candidates who have clear positions and statements and voting records on what they stand for and how they stand to continue to strip away the personal freedoms of americans all over this country. you mentioned a few just in your lead up. the position of the republican nominee in michigan running for governor, dickson she is now
apparently if you are antiabortion but if it s part of your whole package of stuff it doesn t stand out as much as these actual antiabortion measures do. how do you parlay that into victories when you when it comes to abortion rights? you know ali those were all races at a time when what was holding our personal freedoms together was 50 years of precedent. the supreme court has now made a decision appointed by an extreme president and senate leadership that they have made it-ization that they are going to strip those rights away. they re gonna take those freedoms away and take away everything that people were lying on has the backbone to maintaining their freedoms in this country. i think what we are going to see is that law these elections in november are not all of them are not going to be clear cut ballot issues and