i must disagree with david because his arguments have been tried and rejected twice by the supreme court. and i think they would do the same on the contrary. david let me finish. a similar argument was launched in united states v nixon to prevent the president from being subject to subpoena. it failed. it was tried in clinton v jones. it faltd. the constitutional trajectory points to the president being subject to the same laws as the rest of us. that s the idea of america, david, please. this is rhetoric. you know perfectly well that in 2000 oc looked at the supreme court cases, the very ones you mentioned, both paula jones case and nixon case, and concluded that the supreme court were using the exactly same paradigm. but the particular position president, subpoenaing certain documents against the