ourfamily and we are receiving support from our family liaison officers, so obviously we know the police must have been distracted and used up valuable police time and resources on dealing with the public coming to this venue and speculating, and obviously everybody wants the focus to be on the investigation. to be on the investigation. you re absolutely to be on the investigation. you re absolutely right. to be on the investigation. you re absolutely right. yesterday - to be on the investigation. you re absolutely right. yesterday i - to be on the investigation. you re. absolutely right. yesterday i spoke to the senior investigating officer in charge of the inquiry and asked her whether or not she thought that her whether or not she thought that he would be detective seen around this area, the social media influencers who been putting information, most of it fake, much of its opposition, they have been putting that on line and whether that has hindered the inquiry. she said absol
she thought that the would be detectives who have been seen around this area, the social media influencers who have been putting information, much of it fake, much of it supposition, and they ve been putting that online, whether that has hindered the inquiry. she said absolutely. in 29 years of policing, she s never seen anything like that. now, in a separate investigation or in a separate part of all this, today, there is news coming through as well that a man, a man called dan duffy, who posted a video of himself being arrested by lancashire police on his youtube channel called exploring with danny has been fined afterjoining the search. so the police said that they were going to clamp down. they issued dispersal notices on anyone coming to this area after dark causing a nuisance in the area, that they wanted them to leave and they would use police forces, police powers to do that. that seems to have worked in the last few days. there doesn t seem to be the same number of people arou
jury really looks at, the emotional pain that they have been through after, you know, it s kind of torture for them. their children were killed, and he basically called it fake. yeah. i really think so. i mean, certainly we have first amendment&ri rights in this country, but that folds when people are impaired in a very detrimental way and they impact families as you noted. this was not a conspiracy. this was not families in cahoots with the government in order to deal with any or make statements related to gun control, right? it happened. and so when you do that and you affect someone by saying it s not real when they lost their child, that s problematic. why do i mention that? it s not going to be lost on the jury, sara, that has to assess damages, that is, money, and how much they re responsible for paying. what damage did you cause, how were they impaired, and what award were they given. keep in mind as we have this discussion, the whole purpose is
grabbing the wall, calling food, calls it fake. a big picture as a part of the denial will work and they won t politically impact the party during the mid-term. what do you think? first, i think the impact on trump and the republican party has to be separated. i felt right away on january 6th that that reduced his chances of ever being will it lower? will there be some voters attracted to his policies that will otherwise say this is a preview of what we are going to get if we trust him again with the powish of the presidency? i think that s a real slice of the electorate and reenforce after all the revelations of the january 6th committee were not done and the possibility of trump being indicted for his behavior. what it means in the mid-terms for republicans is something else. certainly, there are voters voting with inflation and biden s overall performance.
they come forward against somebody more powerful. when they speak up about gender-based violence. reporter: and on monday, she defended the op-ed. it didn t name depp, but as his lawsuit alleges it cost him work. what, if anything, in this op-ed is incorrect? nothing, every word of it is true. reporter: depp denies any buss and said heard who filed a $1 million countersuit abused him. heard pushed back against depp s team s comments that her allegations were a hoax. to use what i went through and what i survived, calling it fake, saying that i m harming johnny with this, i m harming the public with this. this is what i lived through. and to say that it s a hoax, that these aren t even real things. reporter: heard told the jury the reasons for ending her marriage.