children to through everything through a lens of race. we don t do this. [cheering] on day one i will ban critical race theory in our schools. [cheers and applause] rachel: dave matthews and stacey abrams will campaign for mcauliffe. biden will do so on tuesday. pete: thank you, alexandria. those two speeches sound the same. we ll watch the 9:00 hour of the show. you hear the same thing. you re right. lawrence: i quite frankly find the speech to be tone deaf. rachel: i agree. lawrence: it doesn t address what is happening in the country today. you got the guy that used to be the former governor that is running walking off of interviews where they re discussing crime in america and education, two of the top issues in virginia. and you think the former president is going to somehow rally those independent voters
realistic, track one may happen, but track two may not. we have to have the commitment if we went for track one, you have to have a solid commitment that track two will be supported. this is about people s lives and quality of lives and we re coming out of a pandemic and people s economic security needs to be addressed and the infrastructure of this country needs to be addressed. so we can t have one versus the other. so, we have to have an iron clad commitment that if it were two track that we would be able to pass the second bill. so, it sounds like you have an open mind on this compromise package if you had a guarantee that from at least the 50 democrats that all 50 senate democrats are on board with the bigger package. well, chuck, i don t know what s in this new proposal. i would have to look at it and see but i tell you if it s not big and it s not bold and it doesn t address the needs of people, if it doesn t address lifting people out of poverty and if it doesn t have the
the lawyer s statement does talk about the house dependence house intelligence community and the senate. it doesn t address the fbi, correct? no. his statement i just took a quick look at it. it does not. the fbi is obviously a natural place to go if you re trying to seek immunity or if you re going to be investigated. we know the fbi had interviewed michael flynn a couple months ago when he first was under scrutiny or reported publicly that he was being his communications with the russian ambassador were being investigated and other communications between him and russian officials were being looked at and he was interviewed by the fbi and it would make sense he would have discussions with the fbi and the house intelligence committees as well. i guess when i first read the statement from chairman nunes