timetable because of the pressure coming externally. give us your reaction to that news. i5 give us your reaction to that news. , , . ., , , news. is very welcome. this is what we news. is very welcome. this is what we wanted news. is very welcome. this is what we wanted to news. is very welcome. this is what we wanted to see - news. is very welcome. this is what we wanted to see on - news. is very welcome. this is what we wanted to see on 23 i what we wanted to see on 23 september, when the mini budget was announced in the first place. we wanted to see all those 0br numbers and the chancellor s decisions in context. so that is welcome, it is a step, still it doesn t change the fact that we now have, we still have a loss of unfunded tax cut. it doesn t sound as if the chancellor is planning a larger u turn on those. planning a larger u-turn on those. , . ~ planning a larger u-turn on those. , ., ~ ., those. let s talk about those. he did admit those. let s talk about those.
problem. he caught republicans by surprise. these are people who don t want to be surprised it seems by something like this. so what are they going to do with this with him, as they head towards the midterms? it doesn t sound as if mitch sm mitch mcconnell is trying to push for this vote. of course he is not in charge. it would be chuck schumer, the senate majority leader who could have to voy have to agree to it. there would have to be maneuvering to try to push the vote on the floor. that s a long way sort of washington way of saying it s probably not going anywhere. but again, it s less:00 the legislation, i know this sounds very washington, john, and more about the messaging and the trying to get ahold of the policy. and i can tell you, john, just in the past couple of weeks i ve been in ohio and michigan working on campaign stories. and it has really surprised me
saving for my daughter s college, will you forgive there loans? she said absolutely not. you have the education secretary as well. the white house is making the argument people need breathing room saying people should take out just after the student loan debt forgiven may have paid that back and say we are in a good economy, covid is essentially over especially when it comes to the border so that does not compute saying people are not in a position to pay that. for a guy who calls himself lunch bucket joe, it doesn t sound it s a solidification of the democratic party the party of the athletes and being fine with other people s footing the bill for their degree programs. great piece in the post over the weekend called too much free government aid feeling depressing broke lazy america, let me read a little bit, this free money contributed to a culture of laziness that s
narrowly tailored enough but they also say the judge writes the government has met its burden of showing its redactions are narrowly tale ored. this includes is identities of witnesses, law enforcement agents, uncharged parties. the investigation strategy, direction, scope, sources and methods and grand jury information. that doesn t sound narrow at all. it doesn t sound narrow but i think, gillian, the most interesting in that laundry list is uncharged person. and i find some of president former president trump s public position on this to be a little bit baffling because that suggests to me that the justice department really just wants its stuff back. it is not necessarily bent on charging former president trump, otherwise they wouldn t be that concerned. the justice department always say they aren t supposed to put out information about unchargeed persons but they may
talking about the infrastructure package is not to be trusted here? i said it is not correct because i will give you why it s not correct. it is incomplete. bill: the white house shutting down any criticism the manchin/schumer inflation reduction act will raise taxes on middle class americans. there are various studies that would disagree with that. dan henninger, fox news contributor. here is what we get from the jct. taxes will rise by about $17 billion in 2023 on americans making less than $200,000 a year. taxpayers earning between 200 and 500,000 a year will pay 14 billion dollars more. doesn t sound great, does it? it doesn t sound right at all but, you know, that exchange between peter doocy and karine jean-pierre was pretty important. on the one hand the white house is having a difficult time