it a rubber stamp to give it surveillance? well, ana, a good point, but distinction is that it does not matter the weight in the fisa court, it never should have been there. there is never any point at whichpaicampaign-funded opposition reports should be admitted as evidence. the memo goes on the cite the testimony given and in that expression, it did give the appearance that the weight of this made a difference, but i think that the discussion that we need to have as a country, republican or democrat, is that this should not happen ever, and i don t care if it is appended to the entire contents of wikipedia, it should not be as part of the information precepted as evidence for the court to consider. not one presidential campaign giving information against another presidential campaign in a fisa court is evidence. it is wrong and it needs to be addressed. and why not address it directtally with the doj then, and instead of putting it out there in the public memo, and