law basic law says they should get. and i had an amendment that would tighten it up. if you have two cars, a house and $30,000 in the bank but, you don t have high income, you don t get food stamps. that is what the law says. but states have rewritten the rules to do that. that would save 11 billion out of 800 billion expected to be spent over 10 years. and it didn t pass. i got to tell you i was disappointed at that. jamie: what can you do now about it? and given the fact that it would have saved so much money and you discovered that it is going to people that don t deserve it? i m sure you admit it s a program that can help a lot of folks during these tough times. what can be your next step? well, we are beginning to educate people. people are talking about it. i felt on the floor of the senate a number of people saying, well, you know there are some problems in this program. so the house of representatives, they re going to have an ag bill.
friday? and by executive order? well, it came up for a vote. look, the president for a long time has been committed to comprehensive immigration reform, and he s been committed to the dream act. the fact is, it came up for a vote in congress. this is legislation that originally had a republican sponsor when it was first entered into congress a decade ago. and we ve seen republican instruction. it didn t pass. so the administration has been taking actions where we can to deal with immigration reform. we have offered prosecutorial discretion, focused on criminals. nearly 0% of recent deportations have been focused on criminals. mitt romney may not have taken a position over the weekend but during his primaries made his position clear. he said he would veto it. said his immigration policy was self deportation for even those young people who came to this country through no fault of their own. and he really is the most conservative nominee on this
saying if you re going to institute this horrendously invasive requirement, at least get the woman s consent before you force her to undergo vaginal penetration for an medically unnecessary purpose. so i was hopeful that enough of my colleagues across the aisle would believe that a woman should not be violated without her consent that the amendment might have a chance at passing, i wasn t surprised that it didn t pass but i was disappointed, because i ve heard from many, many women throughout virginia who republican women as well, who may disagree with me on every other political matter but they don t believe that they should be physically violated without their consent and it just shocks the conscience this will become the law of the land in virginia. there is also the personhood
into law. so what i was trying to do was saying if you re going to institute this horrendously invasive requirement, at least get the woman s consent before you force her to undergo vaginal penetration for an medically unnecessary purpose. so i was hopeful that enough of my colleagues across the aisle would believe that a woman should not be violated without her consent that the amendment might have a chance at passing, i wasn t surprised that it didn t pass but i was disappointed, because i ve heard from many, many women throughout virginia who republican women as well, who may disagree with me on every other political matter but they don t believe that they should be physically violated without their consent and it just shocks the conscience this
zero! as in zero votes cast for would believe that a woman anybody. it s not like that is what they should not be violated without showed that night at the her consent that the amendment caucuses, erroneously but might have a chance at passing, resolved since, now they have the real tally, this is what it i wasn t surprised that it didn t pass but i was says according to the state republican party. it s not just belfast. disappointed, because i ve heard from many, many women throughout 17 of the 18 towns that caucused together in waldo county turned virginia who republican women as up blank on the official maine well, who may disagree with me republican party tall list. on every other political matter state republican party has no but they don t believe that they explanation why that is other should be physically violated than to say it was maybe a without their consent and it just shocks the conscience this clerical error, that they have will become the law of the land not corrected.