associates, roger stone and maybe others, but i think the one thing that probably worries him most is the fate of his son donald trump jr. let s just depart from what we know we don t know and let s assume he s been in to see robert mueller and it didn t go well. he perjered himself like half a dozen other people ensnared in the investigation have done so. what would the scenario be, matt miller, for the justice department? might they be holding on to the knowledge that don junior may have some legal exposure? leave this investigation and rod rosenstein s hands until it s come to its natural conclusion, or would that cross some sort of ethical boundary? i don t know that they d do that. i don t think they d use they wouldn t use that to try to preserve the investigation. however, if they were able to build a legal case against donald trump jr. and thought they could also build a legal case against donald trump you ll see prosecutors make those deals where they ll talk to one
it didn t go well. she flupged it all the way through. yes. when the cops were finally done with the two of them for the night, may confronted her mother. i asked her to her face what, did you have something to do with this? i did. i got in her face and they had pictures of like the crime scene and stuff and i smacked them in her face. you think your mother killed ben jr.? i think she definitely had something to do with it. you know, i didn t think she did it herself personally. the cops had only started to peel back the many layers of the novak family story. there was still so much about these people they didn t know. turns out, there were a few things may herself didn t know. but when we come back, she is about to find out. i see my mother coming at me with a crowbar. when family affair continues.
where you could grab for evidence by the defendant? her father was a meticulous record keeper. what s to say it wasn t an answering service that picked it up. they testified there was no something changed in december 2010. there was new evidence discovered. the prosecutor who inherited the case. and that new evidence was what we consider a jail house snitch. and he came forward and stated that michael wolf told him he had fabricated the entire story about barbara participating in the murder of david jackson. a particular jail house snitch who s well-known, the da, said mostly for the false information he provided. still, after three years in jail it was enough to get barbara released and placed on house arrest pending trial. and then prosecutor met michael wolf to ask about testifying about against barbara. it didn t go well. the blow came to me when he
said mostly for the false information he provided. still, after three years in jail it was enough to get barbara released and placed on house arrest pending trial. and then prosecutor met michael wolf to ask about testifying about against barbara. it didn t go well. the blow came to me when he said what am i getting in return, what will my sentence be reduced to. thou, the state reassessed its options. i think with any case you re taking a 50/50 chance. it s the lack of forensics, the lack of physical evidence that the jury wants to see, but most importantly again the fact you have a codefendant who s giving the testimony which was the foundation of this precaution cushion who wanted something in return. the people who conducted the investigation, you know, deep down in your guts are sure that she was at the center of it. did you think so too? what i think as a person and what i think as a prosecutor i have to keep them separate. and while i may have believed
he went after them on this specific issue in court today and it didn t go well. defense lawyer: we did make a special request with the government to receive on an expedite basis any evidence they had to back up their claim miss butina traded sex for a job. that has become unfortunately a big issue in the media. as proffered in the bond hearing before we have no idea what the government is talking about and don t believe it is true. the government has we presume they could give that part of it to us so we could see what it is. the government has not agreed to do that. they said we can wait for discovery to do that. the judge jumps in, mr. saunders, speaking to the prosecutor now, what s your position with regard to the information mr. driscoll just requested. our position is two-fold, we want to make sure the protective order is in place before giving over anything. second, we re concerned as to what use anything will be put. if the defense is seeking