congress and they are going to get the resources. i mean, this is a matter of prime defense of the homeland. it would come first. director comey has said in their 56 field offices, they have investigations in every one. it takes 30 agents to surveil one person. it s an amazingly intensive personnel issue. having said that, i really think we need to take a look at this. while i have you, the patriot ookt act, the bulk data collection was struck down in court. not saying it was unconstitutional, saying the law doesn t cover what the administration has said it covers, which is bulk data collection. says if congress wants to be able to do this, they need to explicitly pass a law that forces telephone companies to do this or not. where are you on this? are you willing to pass a specific law that allow for bulk data collection, whether held by
all 50 states they have some potential isis follower they are following. do they have the resources to deal with this? is it the type of threat we should throw even more money at? well, i will tell you this. if they don t have the resources, they just have to come to the president and congress and they are going to get the resources. i mean, this is a matter of prime defense of the homeland. it would come first. director comey has said in their 56 field offices, they have investigations in every one. it takes 30 agents to surveil one person. it s an amazingly intensive personnel issue. having said that, i really think we need to take a look at this. while i have you, the patriot act the bulk data collection was struck down in court. not saying it was unconstitutional, saying the law doesn t cover what the administration has said it covers, which is bulk data
they don t receive another one what can they do with the four signals as far as triangulating these? this is pretty good, even if they didn t hear another ping, they are still in pretty good shape to start deploying the autonomous vehicle. the reason they hesitate on deploying it is that it covers any particular space, any particular part of the ocean much slower. it is about seven times slower than the ping receiving device. so you want to use that as much as you can as long as the pingers are still in play. get as clear a picture as you can. and then you put in the device with the side scan sonar. they have enough information to do that right now. they just want to get it as precise as they can. just to speed things up ultimately. and one thing angus houston mentioned is that it takes time once they put this vessel under water for them to be able to
to try to figure out what those currents and winds were doing over the past two weeks to try to predict where the debris might be and where the plane might be. yeah, it is it is near impossible. the area that it covers, if you go back in time from assuming that what they saw on the satellite images from a couple of days ago, and assuming that was an actual piece of the airplane, i have tracked it back using the currents and the winds that exist with a variety of wind conditions, and you, because it is in the an arctic polar circle, it could have traveled hundreds of miles over that time, and you are covering this area hundreds of miles long, and as well as north and south tens of miles. and that is just assuming that it is the piece that the you have. and that is assuming that it stays on the surface as well. if we do recover something, we don t know where other pieces went down. and then where in the water column it is. it is going to the travel at
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20131014:15:01:00 comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.