The Supreme Court hears in major First Amendment case today asking what the Us Government can or cannot do to combat misinformation online. And the justices could soon rule on a controversial plan by texas to arrest migrants at the border. Plus, trump unleashed again his defenders said he was talking about and economic bloodbath. If he should lose in november. As democrats and says he was threatening political violence. What is clear, trump predicted the end of us elections if he loses and called january 6 convicts unbelievable patriots and hostages. So a peace rally, his ohio urines was not. And evacuations underway in iceland, a new eruption from a volcano forcing one of the countrys most popular Tourist Attractions to clear out. Were following these major developing stories and many more all coming in right here to Cnn News Central decades of failing to enact Border Policies and washington coming to a head at the Supreme Court today as the federal government and the state of texas c
the dirtbag s first son s laptop was russian disinformed. ? turns out that t the biden campaign orchestrated the entire thing. ex cia director mike morell revealing in sworn testimony s that secretaryworn of state, now secretary of state state anthony blinken, who was then a senior biden campaign adviser, led the effort to release that letter. republican jim jordan ripping t into the revelation that lettere became the basis for keeping ama this information from the american people. and the other thing that was im important, we learned that deposition with mr. morrell is they were even mr. morellh rt was even trying to directbiden who the biden campaign told himi who tos to i get to in the medi. it was that coordinated. that s the scary. itary thin was a totaland the political operation. and the most important fact. is it was false. both joe and hunter use that letter as proof to dismiss the laptop or 50 former national intelligence folks fols who said that what this he s ac
right. which costs more .h costs mo enu develop a new agency, right. to create the office ofvienta environmental justice. a we already have an epa. we have an environmental agency. . it cost 12 billion dollars a year. it has seventeen thousand employees that are part ofental the environmental protection agencyon agenc. then we have a doj if you want justice. right. we ve got the sixtybudget nine billion dollars was f their budget for this year. they hav e one hundred and fifteen thousand employees. so if you can t find someone who is already in the government to solve the problemssolve th that you rg ,you got another problem, ano creating another office, anothetherr agency is very unliy to solve any of the problemsfead that they address. and with regard to these testing, the effectiveness of t these plans, likhee the wind turbine issue, the pentagon is the most recent agency that s sounding an alarm about the wind turbines. e windthey re saying that it conflicts with military operati
this kind of scheme can nullify the constitution of the united states is one that all americans, whatever their politics or party, should fear. if it prevails, it may become a model for action in other areas by other states, and with respect to other constitutional rights and judicial precedence. the lawsuit comes after the supreme court refused to block the law from going into effect. the office of texas governor greg abbott said in a statement it would defend the law. i want to get perspective now with cnn s chief legal analyst and former-federal prosecutor, jeffrey toobin. and wendy davis who filibustered for 11 hours against another restrictive abortion law back in 2013. jeff, does the justice department have a strong case here? well, they it was certainly a powerful and persuasive case. that this law is outrageous, that it conflicts with the constitution. the problem is when you dig into
it would defend the law. former texas state senator jeff, does the justice department have a strong case here? it was certainly a powerful and persuasive case that this law is outrageous, that it conflicts with the constitution. the problem is when you dig into the 27-page complaint the issue is standing. the issue is does the justice department under federal law have the right to bring this lawsuit? because this lawsuit says nothing about the federal government. now, attorney general garland tried to make the case that it has an effect on federal agencies in texas. that may or may not be a persuasive argument to the courts there. but the problem with this whole case from the beginning has been procedurally how to get the