speaks of putin s direct involvement although it doesn t share exactly what s known of it. you ran the cia, you ran the nsa, you know the personality of it, does it comport with his mo as you understand it? it does. michael, i don t go back for briefings. i did read the very detailed article in the post yesterday, and it does have a powerful ring of processability, in terms of all of the elements in the article, based upon my life experience, yes. president obama spoke, the date was october 18, right in the midst of the election. and addressed spome of the aspects of this. let s take a look at what he said and then comment. play it. there s no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig america s election.
executive privilege then we obviously aren t going to find out pretty much very much. if he is forthcoming we potentially get information to fill in some of the gaps things we don t know the answers to, in particular about him leaving the room. what s his memories of that? did it comport with what comey said these things where we now have maybe another person who is witness to what happened either a corroborating witness or somebody who will challenge it. if there was a third meet wg kizlyak the may flower hotel is the report is that a big deal? i mean do you think that s a big deal? because that s a meeting that sessions has not talked about previously. right and if you go back to his original confirmation hearing he had no interactions with russians and not froth one time not twice butforth three times. having said that it would have been with the same guy. and he would argue argue of course that it was done in his
just in terms of session s syst testimony tomorrow, how important do you think it is? and is it possible that executive privilege will be an issue? if he invokes the executive privilege, we obviously aren t going to find out very much. if he s forthcoming, we ll fill in the gaps that we don t know the answers to, what the memory of that, the does it comport with what comey said, where we now have maybe another person who is a witness to what happened, either a corroborating witness or somebody who s actually going to challenge it. there was a third meeting with kislayak at the mayflower hotel, is the report. is that a big deal? i mean, matt, do you think that s a big deal, because that s a meeting that sessions has not talked about previously. right and when you go back to his original confirmation
pushing for more american jobs. reopened a pipeline that was considered dead under his predecessor. how you feel about those efforts and are they sincere and real as what he s doing as president? here s what we re going to do, neil. we re going to put everything he does to two tests. one, does it comport with our values and is it good for working people. if it is, we re going to work for it. if it isn t, then we re going to be against it. we ll tell him exactly where we are on every issue. neil: where are we now, richard? you think he s done more good for your workers? i know it s still a little more than a month in. what do you think? it s been a mixed bag. what he did on t.p.p. was good. the thing he s trying to do with infrastructure is good. there s a lot of those things. on the other side, he put some people in there that were anti-union. tried to put him in position.
control. if you think about it if she wanted these not released under foyea, she could release e-mail address, which is more secure. google has hundreds of people devoted to ensuring e-mails against attacks from foreign adversaries. if you have random server with one tech guy, you aren t as secure. she could use g-mail. the reason she didn t google has e-mails. she wanted a scheme where she controlled the e-mails, not state, not google hillary clinton. when you hear the president say to cbs he found out the media, does that mean he never e-mailed? isn t that kind of strange? that is strange. i alerted his spokesperson in 2013. i saw a comment from the white house. it s not like we published a story and they missed it. i e-mailed josh ernest who is now his spokesperson and said this e-mail address exists. is it does it comport with the presidential records act and