that speech. i think not just democrats, but americans across the country could listen to her and understand that, if you re going to go into a fight. let s have it be a fair fight and this, this is not a fair fight. allegedly. brian kemp will come out and give his side of the story in a few minutes. certainly when you withhold 50,000 voters from being able to participate in this democracy, that s that s a big deal when those voters are more likely to vote against you. those are the main issues right? that was before today? the cheating has been going on for quite some time. you call it cheating. because it is call it like it is. the cheating has been going on for a long time. some will say jerry manderring is not cheating i call it cheating. you call it cheating. looking at voter suppressing that is cheating. we and democrats and republicans if you re an american, you want more people to participate in the political process.
during a match. so i want to ask you, christine, this tweet from john ziegler. he says a question for the female media types breathlessly retweeting sale jenkins column accusing the umpire to be a c f chauffeurist. every sport has its idiosyncrasies and phantom tag in baseball and all different kinds of plays. you could call holding on every play in football and cheating and faking a little you wouldn t call it cheating, it s gamesmanship. it s well known in tennis, as everyone has been saying the last 12 hours, everyone coaches. so the question then is why was serena penalized if everyone is
president to try to press to include that now at this point? well, i would say no. i say most of our allies, that s why boris johnson was here yesterday pleading with the president. we have this isn t a u.s.-iran deal. there s a u.n. council resolution. if iran did this, we would call it cheating and if this deal false apart, it s going to be more difficult, not less difficult to address the missile issue because iran will feel more threatened. the hardliners are about the weapons, not the agreement. if that s the group that prospers here, the missile problem will get worse, not better. melissa: we ll see. much like north korea. thank you, sir. thank you, melissa. jon: the white house promises strict enforcements of immigration laws.
what are you imploring him to consider? well, i want him to listen to his secretary of defense and his former secretary of state and his former national security adviser and all our allies in the international atomic agency. i want him to say this is working. iran is in a box. it can t get out for a long time. let s not open the box. if you do that, then how are the north koreans going to ever believe you re going to follow through on your promises? now, if other countries did this sort of thing, we would say you re cheating. if iran sort of stopped complying with the nuclear rules, we d say iran, you re a cheater. when we do it, when we re the ones who do it first, we seem not to call it cheating. we say well, we re pulling out or trying to fix it. or whatever. but we re cheating. we re going back on our commitment as the united states of america. all right. so that too is threatening the trust that others might have of the u.s. as a result. i hear you loud and clear on that one.
operated. brent, do you agree? have you been surprised by the intensity he talks about? i m not sure if surprise is the right word. there s been a lot of intensity and pushback. but i honestly would have said we expected that. i think the fact that we had the first the nation s first minority president elected. many said this is the end of ris discrimination. that s not the case. you ve seen this active effort by eliminating section five and states trying to pass these restrictive voting laws. instead of playing fair and allowing one person, one vote, they re trying to game the system. we call it cheating. they are trying to get people electd who don t have the majority support of the communities in which they are supposed to represent. we have a map of the states with the voting restrictions.