down. it could be. and clearly because save america is paying for legal fees, they may want approval over not only who the main counsel is but the local counsel too. on the other hand, there is significant financial and reputational risk for those associated with the case. it may make it harder for people to find a south florida lawyer who wants to be involved. the superceding indictment, what charges does it add? two charges against each defendant with respect to obstructing the subpoena over surveillance footage. the allegations say that nauta de oliveira, and trump conspired together to try to get him to erase the footage. donald trump moving on from the arraignments to a request that the legal team is making that can on the face of it look hypocritical. he wants to make mar-a-lago a skiff so he can review
ken dilanian, nbc news justice correspondent. he has some breaking news. ken, fill us in on even more breaking news happening in the last minute or so. reporter: katie, the justice department special counsel s office has now released, issued the superseding indictment filed against now three defendants, donald trump, walt nauta, and carlos deoliveira and these include four additional charges and i m going to read them to you. it add a new count 32, charging trump with one additional count of willful retention of national defense information. and then the superseing indictment also charges trump, deoliveira, and nauta with two new obstruction accounts, based on allegations they tried to delete surveillance footage at the mar-a-lago club in the summer of 2022. finally, the superseding indictment charges deoliveira with false statements and representations in a voluntary interview with the fbi on
policy decisions in the russia-ukraine war? nbc s mark murray joins us now. mark, i want to play some sound from trump this weekend and ask you about it on the other side. when i was president, the world was stable and calm because america was respected and strong. now as we see in russia and all of these other places this whole world is on fire. this world is on fire. before i even arrive at the oval office i will have the horrible war between russia and ukraine totally settled. i ll have it done in 24 hours. so that leads me to the question of whether or not this is going to be a situation where having rallied the allies behind ukraine, this looks good for joe biden, or conversely does it add to a sense of unease from some voters that maybe hurts him or that they re listening more to donald trump? yeah. you know, and chris, our latest
being having it add to that his history of his sexuality and the chair for the outing of that woman s was great television but it s been a soap opera but it s really turn into a very dark trauma. yes interestingly a very dark trauma. yes interestingly when - a very dark trauma. yes interestingly when he i a very dark trauma. yes interestingly when he step down from his role on this morning there was a lot of speculation about whether this is a probably from within itv. i don t know, i mean look, and the separate the celebrity line at the moment is parfor separate the celebrity line at the moment is par for the agents and resources to employ at representation and there s a whole new degree of the way that celebrities reported. if you have an agency with some other talent that they may use as collateral, this is been a lots of movement before it below the water line and a guess that people might watch a programme and might be interested in this probably don t know the whole
confirmation bias, meaning they believed that there was an issue with trump. there was a lot of evidence trump was publicly appealing to russia as we all remember to help him to help find hillary clinton s emails. and what the report says is that the fbi was too credulous about evidence that supported that thesis, and wasn t skeptical enough. and i believe there is something to that, he makes the case in this report. that is a far cry from saying that the fbi was out to get trump for political reasons, durham never established that, there is no evidence of that. again, when you look at how people are reacting to this, donald trump sees it very differently, conservative websites, conservative media outlets read it very differently. do you worry then that this could trickle down? is there any chance this hampers the ability to investigate or prosecute cases that are predicated on the fbi s work? does it add to a general distrust? i think it is very harmful in that respect, somethin