representatives to make marriage policy. we don t need the court striking down marriage laws in all 50 states. evan go ahead. yeah, well, actually, what was just said se completely untrue. in fact, all the evidence that s been now compiled by all the leading public health authorities, the child welfare authorities, groups like the american academy of pediatrics, nation s kids doctors put out another statement in support of freedom to marry. and the experts on child raising all said ending the exclusion from families would strengthen marriage and that s not what they said. the american academy of pediatrics is a left-leaning activist group issuing statements balance the budget and which guns we should ban. another group of pediatrician you men college of pediatrician
how about being there for the takeoff, not the landing? this is really it s always blaming it on the woman and time these laws are unconstitutional. i think that s the key point. they re trying to get something to the united states supreme court. that s what they re trying to do. can i take that point? the precedent has been set, but the precedent is precedent, not necessarily challenged. that s what i think you re seeing here, as a certainly level for certain states. they re devising these bills to go at roe versus wade from a constitutional angle so there s a definitive decision one way or another. that s why you re seeing some of these. they re also reflective of some of the attitudes. you know what, the preachers, rabbis, the government, people they got on the pulpit this weekend and started issuing statements try to avoid unprotected sex, you know what i mean?
the idea that, oh, obama s so smart he s just manipulating us, the master puppeteer, look, politico is the same publication, a serious publication that ran like six stories and marco rubio taking a glass of water, you know, with very little coverage of the substance of the president s remarks. so, look, i think you want to get a press secretary s attention, you want to get access, start holding the president s feet to the fire instead of issuing statements. megyn: and yet, juan, the president s defenders point out that he may not necessarily give ed and the other white house press corps members the love they want or at least the time they want, i told ed he should make, like doe eyes at the president and that didn t work. but anyway, they put out that he does make himself much more accessible to the people directly, town halls and other ways. it s the social media. i mean, he had a google hangout this week. he so, he s able to interact with the american people, he s
countries continues. so much for the great reset from republicans that we are hearing, putin lectured obama on russia s interest in syria. which he said is reminiscent of the kennedy summit early in the kennedy term where kennedy was completely humiliated, lectured by krustc herbv left in a sense of demoralization which encouraged him to put missiles in cuba. this is putin s thinking strategic term, speaking to somebody he considers adolescent. imagine, russia right now is preparing to send three warships to a port in syria which is its facility. each of the shift capable of carrying 300 marines. we are doing something except complaining an issuing statements. russians are asserting themselves on the ground. preventing any embargo. asserting strategic interest. what is obama doing? in what was for 30 years in
cut, unemployment benefits, tax credits for businesses, protection against bias for unemployed job applicants. despite the president s hard line push to nas bill and tireless national campaign, obama s jobs plan essentially die ted hands of senate republicans tuesday on a key procedural vote. 60 votes were needed. clearly, the votes just weren t there. the president knew it was coming. he now has to rethink and regroup. the republicans don t exactly have a concrete alternative jobs bill to fix the problem. so the big question is what happens now? are we back to square one or do we call it plan b? whatever you want to call it let s talk about it with someone who knows a lot about it chief national correspondent and anchor, john king, joining us live now from washington. hi there, john. so the president, he says that he is prepared to break his jobs bill now into pieces in the hopes of getting parts of it throughsome that the answer here, do you think? it is the only answer b