Even appointed its ex e. E. O. Larsen just of sin to be her personal advisor on energy transition. Most heads of state are ambivalent. Not even you dont consider the fast and. Long. I have usually to provide their lucky for you cannot be easy to present in producing items or that they are. Style of play such an easy to transcend all natural home after that bag or start your shop on it because you know it is it just needs to you know know all of the share. And walks off and hes told her mom in a duplicate bottom of their i dont know coffee. They keep some on their. Own full so you can see the minutes has an hour or so where you are. The ones that actually see prove you are not. Exist knowledge insulted 0 most young. Leader econo highest since you know these at that time soon then. There. Are. Some of these to come on for complaint. With conflicts multiplying the power of arbitration tribunals granted and become more threatening. This time 2 populations one in the us and the other in per
A high profile hospitalization of the president that would have been Ronald Reagan when he was shot. By john brinkley. There was he signed a bit of paper that gave power to george h. W. Bush never walker bush of course was his Vice President there was an issue after that when his chief of staff Alexander Haig appeared in the Briefing Room to give an update on the president s condition when asked who was in charge he said im in charge that caused a bit of a constitutional crisis because he has no role to play he wasnt in charge it was the Vice President so the lines of demarcation will be very clearly marked that if for any reason the president has to undergo a general anesthetic or be put into any sort of. Coma medicated coma and there is no suggestion that its close to that at the moment you saw walking out to the helicopter then mike pence takes charge and if anything happens to mike pence 90. Lucy would be the next one to go out and we are saying and actually allan were just seeing
Would have to say that both sides were losers in this one i dont think anyone would have been swayed either side the only people who may have been sway are people who say listen i dont want to vote im not a normal voter but im just now because i think theyre going to court the election if im going to get by and i think that they were convinced to stay on the sidelines yet again i think that that is probably the most important observation that ive heard from anyone looking at these debates its not the partisans its the people it is it worthwhile and i think youre spot on on that point there but you know george lets lets kind of go break it down a bit here i mean one of the things i took away the weekend if we can talk about p. P. I. Trips i dont think it really adds to our conversation here but i mean one thing to trump you know when when when the moderator chris was asked you know about packing the court i mean that was unbiased part that was an obvious obvious deflection he wouldnt an
As we now face a battle over the vacancy in the u. S. Supreme court, we want to focus on what senator joe biden said back in 1992 on the senate floor. Senator biden it is my view that particularly if the reality of a divided government during the time of great change at the Court Continues in the next administration, future confirmations must be conducted differently than the preceding ones. Mr. President , the president s intentions on the existing process which exploded during the thomas nomination fight make restoration of what came before judge thomas nomination even if it was desirable, a practical impossibility. Having said that, mr. President , we face one immediate question, can our Supreme Court confirmation process sow discord and bitterness in an Election Year . Mr. President , history teaches us this is extremely unlikely. Some of our nations most bitter and heated confirmation fights have come in president ial Election Years. A bruising confirmation fight over roger taunys
This is an institution that rests on the trust and reverence of the American People. Losing that trust and reverence is dangerous is dangerous. Its dangerous for millions of people who will lose the Affordable Care act protections. Its dangerous for the women who could lose their right to choose and all of us who do not want to turn back a half a century of progress. Its dangerous for our economy at a time when American Workers and consumers find themselves at the mercy of corporations that have grown larger and more powerful than at any other time since the gilded age. Its dangerous for the future of our planet and safety of our climate, at a time when the west is burning, seas are rising, and the earth is warming faster than ever before. And, quite frankly, its dangerous for our democracy. We owe the American People a voice and a decision that will shape the course of history for generations. And we owe the memory of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and her seat on the Supreme Court more than jus