provisional ruling on a case against israel, a case of genocide, the judge in the court did a super millinery rulings. i think we might now be able to take a little listen to what the judge had to say earlier. at to what the “udge had to say earlier. , , , . earlier. at the present stage in the proceedings. earlier. at the present stage in the proceedings. the earlier. at the present stage in the proceedings, the court earlier. at the present stage in the proceedings, the court is earlier. at the present stage in the proceedings, the court is not - proceedings, the court is not required to ascertain whether any violations of israel s obligations under the genocide convention have occurred. such a finding could only be made by the court at the stage of the examination of the merits of the present case. at this age are making order on the request for an indication of provisional measures, the court s task is to establish whether the acts and omissions complained of
rights genocide convention, the plausible rights connected in this proceeding, namely rights connected in this proceeding, namely the right of palestinians in the gaza namely the right of palestinians in the gaza strip to be protected from acts of the gaza strip to be protected from acts of genocide and related prohibited acts and the right of south prohibited acts and the right of south africa to seek israel s compliance with the latter s obligation under the convention are of such obligation under the convention are of such a obligation under the convention are of such a nature that prejudice to them of such a nature that prejudice to them is of such a nature that prejudice to them is capable of causing irreparable harm. during the ongoing conflict, irreparable harm. during the ongoing conflict, senior united nations officials conflict, senior united nations officials have repeatedly called attention to the risk of further deterioration of conditions in t