have done this at any time, that this had nothing to do with the election. this thing was signed, what, ten days, maybe two weeks before the election, the access hollywood tape had come out, there was all this agita about it. michael cohen said it had nothing to do with the timing. had nothing to do with the election. if michael cohen had years to make an agreement with stormy dani daniels, i mean, 2011 there was an intouch magazine article that got killed. if michael cohen had felt the need to make a nondisclosure agreement with stormy daniels he had 2012, 13, 14, 15, 16. why should anyone honestly believe this had nothing to do with the election? because this is when she came out and threatened to disclose this information. the deal was made. it had everything to do with reputation, with family, with business reputation nothing to do with the election? all of those items, why a person would enter in a nondisclosure agreement. just a coincidence there was two weeks b
this isn t the standard. i know that. i m a lawyer. but for the fact that he was here in this country and he was here illegally, kate steinle would not be dead. that is a lot for people to take, including her family. a new report on how president trump tried to silence top republicans to halt the investigation. e what you do. even love it. and today, you can do things you never could before. you re developing ai applications on the cloud. finding insights hidden in decades of medical documents. and securing millions of iot sensors. so get back to it. and do the best work of your life.
different than what he held bill clinton to when he tried to throw bill clinton out of office because of perjury as alleged by house republicans during the preceding impeachment proceeding. isn t the standard clear for everybody? if you come before the committee and testify on the hill just like if you were being interviewed by the fbi, the standard is you have to tell the truth and there are penalties. absolutely. he should be held accountable and it s not within the jurisdiction of the committee to make a determination as to whether his mistruths or half tr truths or selective amnesia qualifies for the level of criminal scrutiny. there is reason to believe that something is a miss. why have all of the president s men constantly failed to disclose their communications with russia at a time when russian spies were invading our
no-brainer. i don t know anybody to wouldn t preferred to be waterboarded versus being killed along with your entire family. josh earnest is doing an interesting pivot. when it s the interrogation techniques the standard is american values. when it comes to droning all of a sudden the and dwairsd our enemy does. why isn t the standard what our enemy does when it comes to the interrogation techniques. john turner isn t able to provide them. he wants to say look how terrible the terrorists are, they blow up innocent civilians. but when it comes to interrogation he says it s against our core values. bill: 30,000 dead americans on 9/11. michael hayden said remember the context. there is a lot of heat on this
a quite strong, common sense test irrespective of the intelligence that suggests that the regime carried this out. now, do we have a picture or do we have irrefutable, beyond a reasonable doubt evidence? this is not a court of law. and intelligence does not work that way. paul callan, i get twitchy when i hear this is not a court of law, beyond a reasonable doubt perhaps isn t the standard that we re looking for here. isn t that exactly the standard americans have come to expect? well, maybe on television and maybe in court. but this is politics. and frankly, if you look back through american history, this these things have never been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. i ll give an example. remember the maine. that led the sinking of the main in the harbor led to the spanish american war. it this day we don t know who sarv sank the main. resolution based on very little evidence. if international politics were