with the security people with their guns out and people breaking glass and breaking in, so it was pretty terrifying for everyone concerned but also astonishing, because we are in the capitol of the united states and even as this was happening and even as they heard the gunshot, i didn t believe that this was happening, because this was the united states capitol. united states capitol. given that had given united states capitol. given that had given the - united states capitol. given that had given the vivid - that had given the vivid memories and all those questions raised at the time, what do you make of where the us is now one year on? it’s what do you make of where the us is now one year on?- us is now one year on? it s a “um us is now one year on? it s a jump on us is now one year on? it s a jump on of us is now one year on? it s a jump on of the us is now one year on? it s a jump on of the future - us is now one year on? it s a jump on of the future of- us is now one y
the findings of sue gray s inquiry are yet to be published and the metropolitan police say they aren t responsible for the delay. but they ve confirmed they want minimal reference in that report to events they re investigating themselves. more from our political correspondent nick eardley. it basically says that the met had been in contact with sue gray and asked her to only include minimal reference to the event that they themselves are investigating. we had expected to get the report from sue gray earlier this week, perhaps tuesday or wednesday, but the announcement from the met on tuesday about their own probe really threw a spanner in the works, one that is still being dealt with and i think this latest statement will throw another spanner into the works. because it suggests that some of the more serious allegations will not be able to be fully explored in sue gray s report. the language they use in the statement is they want
months so the trade off you are making is we will live with a little extra debt and debt interest and thatis extra debt and debt interest and that is obviously a cost, and we get to enjoy a slightly lower taxes for one more year before the rise come in, that is a trade off that i think people could choose to make. in terms of other options, could they do it in any other way, fund the increase some other way? the? do it in any other way, fund the increase some other way? they could but it is £12 increase some other way? they could but it is £12 billion increase some other way? they could but it is £12 billion worth increase some other way? they could but it is £12 billion worth of but it is £12 billion worth of spending so if you want to raise that sum through a tax rise, it is natural to look at the big taxes we have, like income tax, national insurance or vat, and i guess it is not obvious they picked a particularly unpopular one, both conservative and labour chancellors
of the met police investigation and when it might be ready? when it might be ready? it s very difficult, clearly when it might be ready? it s very difficult, clearly this when it might be ready? it s very difficult, clearly this is when it might be ready? it s very difficult, clearly this is a - difficult, clearly this is a politically enormously important story, and enormously significant police investigation because who might get these fines is very politically significant. but as crimes, they are, at the very, very low end, fixed penalty notices, arguably less than a speeding fine because with those you also get points on your licence, so it s very low end in terms of punishment involved so it not be proportionate for the met to conduct a massive and lengthy investigation lasting many months involving people being interviewed under caution with solicitors at police stations, that s not how it s going to be. i think each person that might or might not have been involved in one
to change to make that happen? it s an to change to make that happen? it s an extremely complex set of circumstances but those of us writing the letter decided to focus on what lower and middle income countries themselves asked for at the world trade organization, which is a temporary waiver of the trade related intellectual property rights. basically this kind of thing does happen a lot when there are urgent public health crises, is the kind of thing that happens with certain hiv treatments or other things where the burden is being felt disproportionately in poorer countries, and pharmaceutical companies have had their return on investment sufficiently rewarded that we don t think they are being disincentivised from developing other future treatments. this disincentivised from developing otherfuture treatments. this is really a very kind of. no one can give you the exact answer, but that is one thing we focused on. i think it would be an easy thing for the uk to do at the world trade