if we re going to have this hypothetical discussion whether trump sid thaid this or not, th no authentication this has taken place. this white house said there is no issue refuting something, they call it fake news. the president has known to do that. they re quick to do that. is that really the national security issue don t you have the burden is that the standard they didn t say yes or no? isn t the burden on the media to actually verify these things before they actually sell it to the american public as fact? i won t make it an argument about that, but the washington post is a world-class some of the best reporters out there. that s right. but if you get it wrong the white house is not refuting it. so you can argue whether it was said or not. look, i m comfortable having yes they have not denied. should he apologize for saying
being engaged in the business of dealing in firearms, because the statute itself does not limit it only to businesses of establishment. it does not carve out the internet. it does not carve out gun shows. what about let me ask you this. why not on gun shows, should the person that s responsible, who puts on the show itself, the promoter, why isn t that the target of saying, you ve got to provide the background check system for your show, anybody that comes in and wants to be at a table selling things, if you want to participate in this show, you have to go through this system here. why isn t the burden on the promoter? it may end up that way. it may be that promoters in order to get people to come sell their wares at gun shows may be willing to offer that service. i think it was pete or perhaps you that mentioned the difficulty that s going to exist with respect to going after people who engage in the business of dealing in firearms at gun shows.
in missouri this government has not been too lenient with clemencies. in other states like illinois the governor ordered 900 clemency. in missouri we had two. what i think his attorney will reach out to say to the governor, look, this man is a great guy. he hasn t done anything wrong. was burden really on him? isn t the burden on the state? he is out on bail to come and arrest him as they did? that, these are the questions that are being, you know looked at to say look, governor, can you just grant him clemency. he will be out on probation. he is happy and has a lovely family and business will go down and what will happen then. jenna: likely already has, ashley, he has been in prison since last summer awaiting for what will happen next. real quick here, do you agree with the strategy as rebecca laid it out? what do you think are the chances that that does happen and anderson walks free? i think unlikely he will get out of prison unfortunately. i ve seen cases like this happen before.
invited to be involved, i think has been an enormous important thing for united way. it s been enormously important for the nfl. but an incredible thing for this country to actually shine a light on the issues so many people care about. yet isn t the burden unfairly falling on organizations like yours, because we know through the sequester we re going through through the government shutdown, they re often the most vulnerable children, children who receive assistance on things like head start, have just been tossed to the curb. well, we have been very concerned about the sequester, the government shutdown. we see and have absolutely felt the impact that that s had on many communities, many families, especially the lowest-income families. but the issue is, we can t do it alone. government can t do it alone, united way, nonprofit organizations. it requires all of us working together, a multiapproach to address many of the issues of poverty, many challenges that low-income and working
can you prove he is sane? when he has diagnosis out there and he acted in a fashion that would be commensurate with vinding of insanity. so what he did planning, that is not the whole equation. you know very well that there s a major difference between legal insanity and clinical insanity. absolutely. there are lots of mentally ill people walking around with a diagnosis of mental illness. that doesn t mean hair legally insane. and he is going to be very easy to prove he was sane at the time of the homicide. isn t it true, ann, we could all assume as citizens of this country that anybody who did something like this, anybody who does these mass shoot sgz mentally ill the way we define it. as a court would define it, isn t the burden for that a lot higher? well, the bottom line is in colorado it s one of the easiest defenses to prove which is you don t have the two part test which which is hard to show insanity. he has been shown to be insane. the fact is the prosecutors can t p