broken out his pledge on taxes. laura: he cleaned out the reaganites. the he gave up, it was workig and would ve signed into law, the automatic spending cuts. congress and the president realized they couldn t get control of spending and the spending cuts were going automatically and then bush raise taxes. laura: take a listen to what perot said in 92 in a debate about what other countries need to do. we can t be the policeman for the world any longer, we spent $300 billion a year defending the world. germany and japan spent around $30 billion apiece. i could spend all my money building industry, that s a home run for me. laura: nato isn t paying its fair share, people who don t know their history don t know perot came before trump.
broken out his pledge on taxes. laura: he cleaned out the reaganites. the he gave up, it was workig and would ve signed into law, the automatic spending cuts. congress and the president realized they couldn t get control of spending and the spending cuts were going automatically and then bush raise taxes. laura: take a listen to what perot said in 92 in a debate about what other countries need to do. we can t be the policeman for the world any longer, we spent $300 billion a year defending the world. germany and japan spent around $30 billion apiece. i could spend all my money building industry, that s a home run for me. laura: nato isn t paying its fair share, people who don t know their history don t know perot came before trump.
nation. as if the two of them just sat together and built all these plans. that is a substantively muddled pitch but politically cunning. the campaign question is whether voters will learn with those things you just heard are falsehood and will they care. the obama administrationing had a strict policy and it wasn t zero policy and it wasn t the same as trump. donald trump pledged mexico would pay for the wall, and instead, you are. a fact that his 2020 communications director explained on this slow last night with a new argument claiming that mexico isn t paying, sure, but in a way in a way maybe they are paying with a kind of a virtual currency. mexico is paying a lot for our southern security. and that. not the wall. i would call it a virtual wall. that s your closing argument? that s the closing argument. trump s justice department on defense defending a losing case this week where they were
on january 24th we can now see the judge denied that request and basically told the special counsel s office he s more than welcome to go seize stuff from this mystery corporation. we can see that ever since the judge gave mueller the green light to seize their stuff the mystery corporation has not tried to pump the brakes. they have not filed an appeal. so it looks like from this docket that mueller and the justice department still have the judge s blessing to go take stuff to account for the 50 grand a day that this corporation apparently isn t paying. now, we still don t know who the corporation is or what country owns them. but they apparently have property or assets in the u.s. that appear to be fair game for the justice department to seize to cover these $50,000 a day penalties the court has imposed. what this means for you is that if anybody has seen federal marshals cuttinging off the gold doorknobs from some foreign-owned corporation in the united states please snap a picture
into what ted olson said there was this is a tough client in a tough situation. if you have a client in a very difficult situation who you can t be certain will listen to you and take your advice, for a lawyer it s sort of a no win situation and you stand down to it. could it be because the reputation has been reported that he doesn t pay for attorneys or for his legal renato, you re nodding your red. that s always a concern. i ll tell you as a lawyer who takes in clients and represents them now, that s always a concern. every law firm evaluates when a you know, what is their ability to pay if a client is coming in. i will tell you, if a client doesn t pay, you re essentially, when you re performing services for a client that isn t paying in advance for them, you re essentially making a loan to them. you re forwarding them money. if you can t be sure you will be paid, it can be a huge problem for firms. how does one get away for