intentionally so we could have a solution to where we are today, and they knew this would happen because history tells us this is what happens to republics. mark: mark meckler, isn t it true, there s two ways to amend the constitution under article 5, through congress. state ratification, through the states, state ratification, that s the only difference. but isn t it true today the supreme court amends the constitution, the massive bureaucracy. in other words, the process isn t being followed and so when you raise one of the processes that actually exists in the constitution, that s actually a legitimate way to address efforts to act outside the constitutional boundarys. you nailed it. and the founders warned us about this, about amending the constitution bit by bit, through the courts, through legislative action. this is why the left opposes this so much because they ve
intentionally so we could have a solution to where we are today, and they knew this would happen because history tells us this is what happens to republics. mark: mark meckler, isn t it true, there s two ways to amend the constitution under article 5, through congress. state ratification, through the states, state ratification, that s the only difference. but isn t it true today the supreme court amends the constitution, the massive bureaucracy. in other words, the process isn t being followed and so when you raise one of the processes that actually exists in the constitution, that s actually a legitimate way to address efforts to act outside the constitutional boundarys. you nailed it. and the founders warned us about this, about amending the constitution bit by bit, through the courts, through legislative action. this is why the left opposes