have that attacks on the homeland. we still have that capability and will use that capability. reporter: ., , ., reporter: what is not hypothetical is the fact the reporter: what is not hypothetical is the fact the us reporter: what is not hypothetical is the fact the us military reporter: what is not hypothetical is the fact the us military has - reporter: what is not hypothetical is the fact the us military has been. is the fact the us military has been coordinating is the fact the us military has been coordinating on is the fact the us military has been coordinating on the is the fact the us military has been coordinating on the ground - is the fact the us military has been coordinating on the ground with . is the fact the us military has beenl coordinating on the ground with the taliban coordinating on the ground with the taliban last coordinating on the ground with the taliban last two coordinating on the ground with the taliban last two weeks coordinating on
from him? that was a fascinating interview. i m wondering if you and alisyn swore him in because as he told us, he feels no obligation to say anything truthful to the media. and i think he revealed himself today. we saw yesterday a failed foot soldier of a president in search of obstruction of justice, obstruction of us and congress and our constitutional obligations to over see the corruption of a president. just total cover-up. and mr. lewandowski is just a small player in that. the big player, of course, is the president who sought to obstruct justice and who sought yesterday by not having porter come in and by having him to obstruct our work. what corey told alisyn is he was as honest as he can be, which isn t saying i m being honest right now. no. but he told our attorney
i had a conversation with jeff. and then i didn t see jeff, and i never delivered the message because i took my children on vacation. if that s the crime if there s a crime to take my children on vacation, i m guilty as charged. corey, you didn t do it and you didn t do it because you must have thought it was wrong. alisyn, i didn t think anything was wrong. the president never asked me to commit a crime. he never asked me to do anything wrong. yes, he did. you admitted it yesterday. why are you not i admitted that he never asked me to commit a crime. you re absolutely right. i admitted yesterday the president never asked me to commit a crime. i concur with your decision. yes, that s accurate. corey, asking the attorney general to limit the scope of an investigation that the president is being investigated for is a crime. we re talking about a hypothetical conversation which never transpired this isn t hypothetical. and a meet chicaing which ne occurred. you can g
courts. absolutely. now, when the president talks about taking money away from disaster relief funding, and that is under consideration right now, can you explain what impact that would have on your district? it would be terribly, terribly serious, the disaster recovery money that was allocated last spring in the appropriation process is absolutely necessary to shore up the levies in the sacramento region. and for one of our communities that has 35 foot levies all around it within moments of a break in the levies that entire community of 14,000 people would be inundated in water that is very, very cold. there would be numerous, numerous deaths. so it s a very serious problem of life, death and obviously property. and this isn t hypothetical, exactly. you were able to get some of the documents which list the specific projects being reviewed by the administration as it considers where to go after this funding? absolutely.
i assume both the republican and the democrat, let s say jeb bush and hillary clinton for example are going to start with mid 40s and then try to get to 50 from there. that s the way it has become in american politics. it s very even. you look at florida, it is going to be a toss-up. it s jeb country and hillary country. this is going to be a nasty, ugly dogfight. beth, one of the things that ignited so much excitement about hillary clinton as a possible nominee is how good her polls looked a year ago. she was just prohibitive across the board in general election and any poll you would run. yeah, but she wasn t in office and that s the difference. everybody s polling is great when they re not doing anything. as soon as she became a serious candidate, people were saying yes, she s running, this isn t hypothetical, then the scrutiny gets higher. so while the polling, i m not sure it had anything to the with the e-mails. people are looking at her