but as is often the case people have locked up the gates once again and in fact as you know they are securing the gates. abbey gate is the only gate that we understand will be open in the future and we still have at least from our rolls at least 60 to 100 u.s. citizens who have been going to the gays for three or four days at a time yet to get in and it looks like it will be even more difficult. one of the things that doesn t make any sense to me and i guess terrorism never makes sense but sometimes there is some sort of message that they are trying to send. the u.s. is leaving, right? like the u.s. is going so this isn t an attack to say get out of this country which is one of the reasons we ve had u.s. terrorist attacks against u.s. forces in the previous 20 years. what message do you think isis-k is trying to send here? there s two messages. the u.s., you have failed to secure your perimeter and that s a basic fundamental expectation of any of your operations, so shame on you fo
our division was a block away from the white house. i used to walk over there. so we they tighten it up and they are already spinning the computers on this tag and the vin, the occupant, who is it. is it someone disoriented. because washington could be very confusing to get around. and it really can be. there is a lot of security, and a lot of streets that are confusing. and if people aren t familiar with it, and sometimes maybe they are in distress, they can do stuff that is just plain stupid. and it really isn t an attack. but many have occurred there. we have the guy that got in with the knife a couple of years ago in the residence and then the guy with an ak-47 shooting on the sidewalk on pennsylvania avenue. there is a number of cases. so they have to be tight on it. let me ask geoff, the australian prime minister was at
sanction on russia that passed 517-5? why won t the president sit down with director mueller and answer his questions as he once promised to do? why isn t the president decrying the fact that russia, as we sit here now, interfering in the next national election coming up in may according to his own national security adviser? so there were a lot of questions raised this week about russian interference, none of which have anything to do with the republican memo, which, again, seeks to deceive and deflect and distract people from the central issues. what do you say to the house speaker paul ryan who has urged his conference not to make connections here between this memo and the mueller investigation? do you have any concerns about abuse of fisa power? i have considerable concerns about abuse of power by the white house who has sought to politicize both our national law
from would be disclosed to the judge. so the judge who is making this decision to spy on an american is doing so with all of the information fully disclosed. and i do think that will be a positive outcome of this memo being released in the future. and you don t see any danger there s one person who has stepped down, written an opinion column saying that he has stepped down from the fbi because it s essentially being attacked and that s bad for the country. do you see any danger along those lines? no, this isn t an attack. it is oversight. and clearly someone who has been, you know, found out to be having this kind of bias is going to say what they can to defend themselves. but this is direct oversight by congress. it is our job. it s what makes america great. again, whether it s the d.o.j. or fbi and medicare and medicaid folks, we keep an eye. we ask tough questions. we try to get to the bottom of things. make sure things are being done
from would be disclosed to the judge. so the judge who is making this decision to spy on an american is doing so with all of the information fully disclosed. and i do think that will be a positive outcome of this memo being released in the future. and you don t see any danger there s one person who has stepped down, written an opinion column saying that he has stepped down from the fbi because it s essentially being attacked and that s bad for the country. do you see any danger along those lines? no, this isn t an attack. it is oversight. and clearly someone who has been, you know, found out to be having this kind of bias is going to say what they can to defend themselves. but this is direct oversight by congress. it is our job. it s what makes america great. again, whether it s the d.o.j. or fbi and medicare and medicaid folks, we keep an eye. we ask tough questions. we try to get to the bottom of things. make sure things are being done properly, taxpayer dollars spent correctly.