but he s right in the sense that this is a bit different than most things we have dealt with in the past. take climate change for example, we re all concerned about it now. who would have predicted something like the paris agreement, people coming together pretty much countries from around the world. there s still a lot of work ahead, but you can see the right conversations beginning to happen and you feel the urgency, and so i also see evidence that humanity rises to the occasion. right? so, i think it will play out a similar way. isn t ai and climate change fundamentally different in this sense? if someone dumps dumps some carbon in the sky, it s bad for you and it s bad for me, so we should make a deal to get that carbon out of the sky. isn t the point about al that the different needs of different societies in different nations will use ai for different ends, and so because of that, artificial intelligence isn t a sphere of cooperation, it s a sphere of competition.
couple rise to £1660, - is, on first april, the price couple rise to £1660, a i is, on first april, the price i couple rise to £1660, a 30% rise couple rise to £1660, a 30% rise in couple rise to £1660, a 30% rise in the couple rise to £1660, a 30% rise in the price. couple rise to £1660, a 30% rise in the price. that - couple rise to £1660, a 30% rise in the price. that is - rise in the price. that is monumental, rise in the price. that is monumental, it - rise in the price. that is monumental, it is - rise in the price. that is - monumental, it is destructive for most monumental, it is destructive for most people s monumental, it is destructive for most people s bills, - monumental, it is destructive for most people s bills, it- for most people s bills, it means for most people s bills, it means that for most people s bills, it means that year on year they will be means that year on year they will be shouldering, means that year on year they will be shoul
rises to the occasion. so i think it will play out a similar way. isn t ai and climate change fundamentally different in this sense? if someone dumps some carbon in the sky, it s bad for you and it s bad for me so we should make a deal to get that carbon out of the sky. isn t the point about al that the different needs of different societies in different nations will use ai for different ends, and so because of that artificial intelligence isn t a sphere of cooperation, it s a sphere of competition. so are people right to worry. do you worry that if google, america, doesn t take control of the future of ai, china will? i definitely think there will be a competitive aspect to it. there will be national security aspects to it. those are important questions. but where i draw the parallel to climate change ai is profound enough that you re going to meet safety
take climate change for example, we re all concerned about it now. who would have predicted something like the paris agreement, people coming together pretty much countries from around the world. there s still a lot of work ahead, but you can see the right conversations beginning to happen and you feel the urgency, and so i also see evidence that humanity rises to the occasion. so, i think it will play out a similar way. isn t ai and climate change fundamentally different in this sense? if someone dumps dumps some carbon in the sky, it s bad for you and it s bad for me, so we should make a deal to get that carbon out of the sky. isn t the point about al that the different needs of different societies in different nations will use ai for different ends, and so because of that, artificial intelligence isn t a sphere of cooperation, it s a sphere of competition. and so, are people right to worry. for instance, do you worry that if google, america, doesn t take control
i put myself in what would it have been to be in the 1930s? they ve gone through world war i, spanish influenza, you re going through a depression, and world war ii s about to happen. so, you know, i do think today is far better than that time. and so we work through a lot of challenges. so i m optimistic that way. but he s right in the sense that this is a bit different than most things we have dealt with in the past. take climate change for example, we re all concerned about it now. who would have predicted something like the paris agreement, people coming together pretty much countries from around the world? there s still a lot of work ahead but you can see the right conversations beginning to happen and you feel the urgency, so i also see evidence that humanity rises to the occasion. so i think it will play out a similar way. isn t ai and climate change fundamentally