that has kicked a lot of butt. so, yeah, i think that has softened. dan what this debate comes down to is not who gay people are and where gay people are. we are who we are, and if there s no openly gay people in whatever environment you re talking about, that doesn t mean there s no gay people. i think what this comes down to is who straight people are. this isn t about whether jason collins or other athletes who happen to be gay are pansies, it s about whether heterosexual men, if they re afraid of gay men, if they re jumping up on chairs and shrieking and too terrified to shower in the same conditions that marines and sailors and airmen and everyone shower in. that s the irony here. this isn t about who gay people are, this is about who straight people are.
that has kicked a lot of butt. so, yeah, i think that has softened. dan what this debate comes down to is not who gay people are and where gay people are. we are who we are, and if there s no openly gay people in whatever environment you re talking about, that doesn t mean there s no gay people. i think what this comes down to is who straight people are. this isn t about whether jason collins or other athletes who happen to be gay are pansies, it s about whether heterosexual men, if they re afraid of gay men, if they re jumping up on chairs and shrieking and too terrified to shower in the same conditions that marines and sailors and airmen and everyone shower in. that s the irony here. this isn t about who gay people are, this is about who straight people are. and are straight people better than they ve been built?
sandra day o connor says it was probably a mistake for the court to take the infamous bush v. gore case. her comments come 13 years after the ruling where she voted with the majority to give george w. bush the presidency. now, she tells us lgbt activist dan vafasavag says the conversation over jason collins coming out isn t about gay people. ultimately, this comes down to is who straight people are. this isn t about whether jason collins or other athletes who happen to be gay are pan sis. it is about weather heterosexual men and pro athletes in locker rooms are pan is zis children of same-sex couples will soon be treated like everyone else when it comes to applying for federal student aid. it will take into account income
is already playing out in political circles. it s playing out in individual states. so why should it be up to the supreme court to decide. that s like asking why should the supreme court get into decide regarding race. you know, this notion that comparing marriage equality to roe v. wade may work when it comes to hypotheticals among those deep into the law, but when it comes to morality, there really is no comparison. this isn t about whether or not someone should have their right to choose to guide their own bodies. this is something the supreme court has already ruled on 14 times and that is marriage. marriage is a fundamental right of americans. they have already decided this 14 times. so really what this is just a repeat of something that justices before them have done. one other thing i would like to make note of is that this isn t
another election after a recall. i think he did. why is it so many people are afraid of the ability for a worker to decide if they wanted to join a union or not. this is not dismantling or banning unions. this is giving an individual the right to choose not to pay union dues and be in part of something they might not agree with. that is exactly what america wants. more importantly, you have a ton of businesses, more than 90 businesses have located in indiana because they like to go to places that are right to work states. that is the reason the legislature is doing this. they said we re not killing the union. if an individual doesn t like the union, they should not be forced to join something they don t like. let me correct you. those businesses threatened to go to indiana. they haven t gone yet. some of them did. this isn t about whether or not you have to join the union or not. sure it is.