is that a fine point? shannon: that s how we answer that question. he tweeted an apology. he said i want to apologize to aaron at the post for my inappropriate link which in response to her question. as a former journalist, i know how important it is for a free society to respect reporters and answer questions honestly. right now there is to sort of candidates, to people the republicans have focused on. bernie sanders and alexandria ocasio-cortez. shannon: her seat is a lock. she s in a locked seat in one of the farthest left. her candidate lost last night, that speaks to the fact that the democratic party isn t a party of socialists, even though republicans are trying to paint us as one. the chairman of your party said she is the new face of the party. she is young and bright and of color. that s the future of what the party looks like. the future of the party also looks like stacey abrams and georgia.
to do here. which is stop speech. and the first amendment says you can t do that. and the supreme court and the pentagon papers case of course said that you can only do it maybe if the publication would result surely in direct and immediate and reparable damage to the country. and this hardly meets that standard so i don t see any way that the trump folks can really stop this interview from being aired. do you think that cbs has any exposure? everything is a double entendre in this case, in so far as they put her on the air and she s violating the nda? no, i think they have to be careful about exposure, particularly when it comes to potential claim of invasion of privacy, but in terms of the nda cbs isn t a party to the nda. it s a question of whether trump is a party because he didn t
can t do that and the supreme court and pentagon papers of course said that you can only do it maybe if the publication would result shirlur surely in o the nation or its people. and stormy daniels talking about her sexcapade hardly meets that standard. so i don t see anyway that the trump folks can stop the interview from being aired. do you think that cbs has any exposure everything ure fromt insofar as they put her another air and she is violating the nda? no, i think they have to be careful about exposure particularly when it comes to a potential claim of invasion of privacy. but in terms of the nda, cbs isn t a party to the nda. it is a question of whether trump is a party because he didn t sign the document. but putting that aside, i don t think they can get to cbs
first of all, crying chuck is not as good as lying ted. the president needs to workshop that better. yes, he is happy to make nancy pelosi a part of their messaging. last night in the rally in iowa, he talked repeatedly about how republicans run up success in the special elections in the last few months, plrl the one in georgia which was made of both parties, democrats eager to make as a referendum on the trump administration and the president took the stage and floated about the win. let me go off to it. lillian na was talking about it with her public phrase, one foot in the grave. we have a party caucus capable of riding this wave. we have 80-year-old leaders and 90-year-old ranking members, this isn t a party. it s a giant assisted living center. so that is a little aegist. there is a point that is the generational divide. you are seeing the candidates
scheduled to, jackie. one thing to you before we go, what do the democrats need to do here? these are bad losses for them. 0-4. politico quoting one democratic insider today saying we no longer have a party capable of riding the wave. we have 80-year-old leaders. this isn t a party. it s a giant assisted living center. are democrats going to take this seriously? ouch. obviously the comment is a nasty won. but the loss after loss after loss and this president scoring victory after victory. it s true. i m not a democratic strategist, but i can say democrats do have the power to change their leaders. they do have elections and right now you haven t seen a real if not nancy pelosi who has been really someone who has been attacked today, who? they haven t been able to answer that question. no one else has built the coalition she has been the democratic caucus. one of the things you hear from democrats in d.c. is that they don t have a solid economic