you got the woodward book, dozens of sources. this one is an echo if anything. this isn t a new song of this man doesn t take the job seriously enough, doesn t do it with enough seriousness, is abusive. we have to counteract him. this is not a new thought. well, let me i understand that, chris. let me just be i want to be very clear here to my friends in the white house and elsewhere that going after bob woodward is a bad idea. you know, every single president for as far back as i can remember has gotten a bob woodward and tried to say they weren t true, and they always were. so i think what the problem with the bob woodward book is people were talking to him, and some of them i think were lying. some of the things in that book, i don t believe, but i don t think it s won woodward. taking it out on bob woodward is a bad idea. the fact of the matter is this op-ed wasn t just written by a coward. it was written by someone who is diabolical, chris. but are they right about the sit
throw people off the scent and make us suspect mattis, pence, and kelly. you don t know that. you re in a little bit of ted kaczynski letter analysis mode right now. they re all talking about lodestar. certainly mike pence has used it but other people use the word lodestar. it s not like it s old english or something like that. this is beltway, swampy stuff. it happens. i ve been in washington they re an appointee of the president. it s your alligator, caputo. why blame it on the swamp. understood. i blame it on the swamp because the swamp rose up and tried very hard to get appointed to this president s administration. i think the president was that s another tin foil hat theory. you don t know this person was some kind of inside fix for this mythical swamp. you got the woodward book, dozens of sources. this one is an echo if anything. this isn t a new song of this man doesn t take the job seriously enough, doesn t do it with enough seriousness, is