way. clinton s ratings did go up during that time. president trump s has gone up a little bit. 46% in the harvard harris poll now trending up to 60 in one poll he has actually been improving. if there is going to be a big fight here. if there is impeachment report, democrats will have to decide will have to died do last time. if this about boomerang again. after all, there are 60 something nature vote this president out on a campaign finance violation that isn t a campaign finance violation. ed: mark penn lays it out. pete: thank you very much. the chaos in paris continues. practically everything shut down. the eiffel tower area, various tourist areas because of these protests. where is french president
mueller going? it does look like 198 all over again and to me i spent a year, you know, fighting ken starr and i thought that was wrong for the country. it looks like it s going to be just as wrong for the country when you see how this case is moving. what they really said here was the president participated in what they are calling illegal and secret. it s built on a hous house of cards. edwards was acquitted for similar payments. the fec ruled that his case these are personal payments. what they did here was to pressure people who they found with tax evasion to plead guilty to charges that they would never have to prove that they could then use to try to create this impeachment trail and burn the country into turmoil over something that really isn t a crime to begin with. nicole: hi mark, thanks for being here. nicole here. we spent $30 million on an
legally it s not. you re allowed to lie to the public and that s not a crime. what you re not allowed to do is lie to investigators. one of the things i find fascinating is how much jeopardy is the president s legal team in? if the president s legal team was colluding with cohen to lie concoct cohen s lies, then they re in trouble, not just the president. this is a really big problem. look, trump has no credibility except with those people who sort of believe in him as a religious figure. he has no credibility. everybody knows that he lies, and the question now is, has he crossed the line legally? and it looks every day that this goes on that he has more and more. guys, i want to make a very quick and final sharp turn here. i think it s worth it because it is a tweet from alexandria acosta cortez. it raeeads, in my on-boarding t congress, i get to pick my insurance plan. as a waitress, i had to pay more
listen to what he said here. and like every political reporter i was interested in knowing what exactly they had. there was no response to that. if i send you an e-mail saying george, you should rob a bank but you don t rob a bang. yeah. i m curious, is that something that would hold up in court? aren t you guilty if you re working towards completing it? yeah. what he said is not accurate. there is a crime called solicitation. if you ask someone to commit a crime on your behalf you re guilt dpts y even if they did not follow through with the crime. that alone is not true. it is possible to engage in conspiracy by agreeing to commit a crime. it did come to fruition. i think on either level roger stone is wrong. i think i share the thoughts that he is perhaps facing his
that you are a target? well, it suggests nothing at all. again, where is the crime? i have always made it clear that so called dirty tricks come up to the do not cross the line into lie galty. . roger stone denying he may have. it comes as the washington post reports the president made late-night calls from a blocked number. joining us now is msnbc legal and it. good day to you. i will get to the washington post report in just a moemt. your reaction? a couple of things. he says it does not cross the line. i think it depents what the dirty tricks are. one of the things is that he framed it not as just the hacking crime but as a crime to defraud the yietsz by interfering with our elections.