blindfold on and picked things randomly to do, he could have a better outcome or set of outcomes than we have seen in the last few weeks. the blue chip thing was so foreseeably terrible an idea, and everybody said it, but this is someone who has no idea what they re doing, but they re committed to doing it their way. the problem is there s real stakes attached. i don t care if a mulsh national trillion or billion dollar corporation loses money. but when you start talking about national security, when you talk about the wellbeing of everyday people, when you talk about the ability to advance our conversation and the cause of justice, now we have something to lose. a lot of people are going to be unemployed because of this. roger, you once advised mark zuckerberg isn t part of the problem the elevation of these tech bros as some sort of geniuses, as if they are on this sort of higher level that they should almost be worships when they re actually just regular flawed people that are stu
running for president? and what is that going to mean and whoo kind of white house will it be if i run for president versus if i m not running for president? you have to make that decision first. dana: when does he have to make that decision? well, now. pretty much dana: after thanksgiving? yeah. bill: how do you game that out in your own head. if i m running it will be this way. if i m not running it will be this way. if i m running i m all about re-election. if i m not running i m all about legacy. okay? so then what do i put on the board? the first one swing voters we didn t get. where we lost, how we lost it. issues that we re deficit on. legacy, totally different board. what is it that i really want dana: isn t part of the legacy who succeeds him? obama didn t seem to place that as very high on the legacy. it doesn t seem to be much of a foreign policy notion of legacy
this is sort of this tea leaf reading, but the tea leaves and d.c.. that s what they are fighting about, and if he loses that means that the subpoena commands, they original subpoena says, give us everything from everywhere. remember, doj suspects but doesn t seem to have enough to rise to probable cause, they still have some. it could be saying that they didn t comply fully without subpoena, and let s talk about it but in a secrecy, just because as a granary issued a subpoena, technically. we ll tell you, when i hear it subpoena, i can t help with what the january six upon us. that was, no issue to the former president of the united states. it was on the backdrop of the january six committee and the notion that democracy being in peril it was a clear and present danger. you wonder how this plays politically. because you do have the overwhelming discussion and talking points from at least the trump team of this is yet another attack, political witch hunt, et cetera. how does this p
needed? as a last resort, yes. if you could, david, talk about what he is navigating here in terms of the relationship with israel, who he is meeting with, and then the next trip. which, in some circles, is quite controversial. so biden is trying to meet with the range of current and possible future israeli leaders to maintain this stability and continuity to the relationship. biden believes in it. interesting that this is a rare trip to the middle east, mika, in which a strong effort by the u.s. on palestinian peace issues simply isn t part of the trip. so often when presidents go, it is with a new palestinian peace plan. it s part of a broader diplomacy. not so here. biden is being very pragmatic. we knows there is not a chance for a breakthrough. i think the big news on this trip is going to be the saudi
to 21 seeking to buy a long gun. let me just say, there s still a lot of work to do, a lot of way to go but i m encouraged by today s announcement. no question, and i want you to talk about the change in strategy among you and your fellow democrats on this issue. you, apparently led by senator chris murphy of connecticut, decided to basically take what you can get. you need a partner in that strategy and in those negotiations and of course, those are republicans, but to that end, the notion of an assault weapons ban wasn t on the table in these negotiations. even what you just talked about, a federal red flag law wasn t in these negotiations, isn t part of the deal or even raising the age from 18 to 21, i realize that there s, there will be strengthened background checks for young people but simply to raise the age which certainly, i m sure you wanted, wasn t part of this. talk about the change in how you