supporters to go home. trying to make the case that trump chose to allow his supporters to carry out that deadly assault on the capitol. on january 6th, when lives and our democracy hung in the balance. president trump refused to act because of his selfish desire to stay in power. president trump did not fail to act during the 187 minutes the between leaving the ellipse and telling them up to go home. he chose not to act. one of the committees key points, donald trump knew the capital was under siege 15 minutes after he left the rally. yet, made no effort to stop the violence. at 1:25, president trump went to the private dining room off the oval office. from 1:25 until 4:00 the president stayed in his dining room a hits connected to the oval office fire short hallway witnesses told us that on january 6th president trump sat in his usual spot at the head of the table facing a television hanging on the wall. it would take probably less than 60 seconds from the oval of
187 minutes of what was described as donald trump s dereliction of duty on january 6th. we also heard testimony from two former white house insiders, deputy national security advisor matthew pottinger, and sarah matthews. they both resigned shortly after the insurrection took place. the panel tonight focused on those three plus hours between the time donald trump left the rally, and when he sent out that tweet telling his supporters to go home. trying to make the case that trump chose to allow his supporters to carry out that deadly assault on the capitol. on january 6th, when lives and our democracy hung in the balance. president trump refused to act because of his selfish desire to stay in power. president trump did not fail to act during the 187 minutes the between leaving the ellipse and telling them up to go home. he chose not to act. one of the committees key points, donald trump knew the capital was under siege 15 minutes after he left the rally. yet, made no eff
but then, for me in your dog are going to bark back at that, you would save your data because you wouldn t do anything that is breaking the law. perhaps the people who did were doing something that they themselves need to cover up. so stephanie, that was very perceptive, that was the point i was trying to make. sorry that was really good. because that is what i was saying. if you are thinking that way. you are doing things that could be nefarious. and in counterterrorism, when you see somebody was like hey, look, this guy doesn t have his text anymore. he was just involved in something pretty bad. probably deleted them. and this isn t all comes razor. we don t have to go through all these iterations to know that they re all these kind of things that happen. here s what happened. probably some did follow calms plan for the knights eight secret service s.o.b.. some people might have deleted him. now they don t have them and i have a criminal inquiry. and people who did not keep
something pretty bad. you probably deleted them. this isn t all comes razor. you don t have to go through all these different iranians to know that these all these kind of weird things that might happen. here is what happened. somebody didn t fall away comes planned handsome people manipulated them. now they don t have the minute you have a criminal inquiry. you are people who did not keep their oath to the office. and this is an ethical and integrity big. based on people taking an oath. there s also no look at the thing here. and again, watching the committee that they, stephanie i think it has come full circle on this. we haven t really seen the depths of technical data that the committee is trying to parse. and i bet you the doj s authorities have a lot more data than we can imagine and i know it is hard for people to be patient but i really asked them to. because the data part of this is something we have never experienced before in the history united states. then a few slides that