grievances. trump did the same thing to them as he did to this man. okay, great, on to the next one. we re making a very big to-do out of this. the funny thing is, the liberal panel it is a big to-do. i like big to-dos. this citizenship question started with hillary clinton. when she was running against obama. are you proud of that? it didn t start with hillary clinton. it started with supporters, it did not start with her or her campaign. that just is not true. say this is some kind of a plant, because right-wingers can t take responsibility for the fact that there are people like that who are supporting trump. that s his base. nativist, white, anti-muslim, islamphobic. look at your base. wall streeters, people who want to kill cops. that s ridiculous. i just did what you did.
grievances. trump did the same thing to them as he did to this man. okay, great, on to the next one. we re making a very big to-do out of this. the funny thing is, the liberal panel it is a big to-do. i like big to-dos. this citizenship question started with hillary clinton. when she was running against obama. are you proud of that? it didn t start with hillary clinton. it started with supporters, it did not start with her or her campaign. that just is not true. say this is some kind of a plant, because right-wingers can t take responsibility for the fact that there are people like that who are supporting trump. that s his base. nativist, white, anti-muslim, islamphobic. look at your base. wall streeters, people who want to kill cops. that s ridiculous. i just did what you did.
grievances. trump did the same thing to them as he did to this man. okay, great, on to the next one. we re making a very big to-do out of this. the funny thing is, the liberal panel it is a big to-do. i like big to-dos. this citizenship question started with hillary clinton. when she was running against obama. are you proud of that? it didn t start with hillary clinton. it started with supporters, it did not start with her or her campaign. that just is not true. say this is some kind of a plant, because right-wingers can t take responsibility for the fact that there are people like that who are supporting trump. that s his base. nativist, white, anti-muslim, islamphobic. look at your base. wall streeters, people who want to kill cops. that s ridiculous. i just did what you did.
whatever it is. but the reality is every time they do these studies remember the nypd a couple years ago put together study that is found that somewhere between 15 and 20% of muslims can be radicalized or would be willing to be radicalized. if you do the math on the numbers, i don t care what you say. call me whatever you want. islamphobic or whatever. but 16% of the muslims in the world or 15 or 20% of the 4 million muslims in america can be radicalized, we re talking 50 75,000 people in america who could be radicals and somewhere around 300 million people who could be radicalized? am i doing the yeah. 32 million people around the world could be radicalized. so if you focus your attention on them aren t you more likely going to find the bad ones, the ones that are willing to be radicalized and kill americans? is that profiling?
incident. of course, charlie hebdo was fire bombed in 2011. in denmark, the newspaper, the cartoonist responsible for the cartoon, only escaped an axe-wielding attack by fleeing into a panic room. another person was apprehended in o hare airport in chicago. so, this is one thing we heard from we ve heard about just how serious this is indeed from so many leaders around the world. so many have emphasized that threat to free speech you mentioned. what can european countries do specifically to protect free speech going forward in response to this? i think historically there have been quite meek and equivocal reactions from politicians and intellectuals who have been sort of on the on the fence of defending free speech out of fear of appearing islamphobic. you have to stand up for basic principles of free speech.