going to get to the inquiry, discussing all sorts of stuff. a lot of people think this principle, this dichotomy between the public interest and what is of interest to the public is terribly important when it comes to our law. doctor evan harris, it s been a long time stop evan harris, it s been a long time sto ; ., evan harris, it s been a long time sto ., is evan harris, it s been a long time stop- is this evan harris, it s been a long time stop- is this any evan harris, it s been a long time stop- is this any of- evan harris, it s been a long time stop- is this any of our- stop hello. is this any of our business? stop hello. is this any of our business? the stop hello. is this any of our business? the element - stop hello. is this any of our business? the element thatj stop hello. is this any of our. business? the element that is stop hello. is this any of our- business? the element that is not the right question, the question. that is the question we re asking this morning
getting tedious and bored of it, and as i said to ben that i spoke - getting tedious and bored of it, and as i said to ben that i spoke to, ii as i said to ben that i spoke to, i think as i said to ben that i spoke to, i think the as i said to ben that i spoke to, i think the law as i said to ben that i spoke to, i think the law is as i said to ben that i spoke to, i think the law is a as i said to ben that i spoke to, i think the law is a bit as i said to ben that i spoke to, i think the law is a bit archaic i think the law is a bit archaic because think the law is a bit archaic because as think the law is a bit archaic because as i think the law is a bit archaic because as i described i think the law is a bit archaic because as i described to i think the law is a bit archaic i because as i described to him as think the law is a bit archaic - because as i described to him as see it, if because as i described to him as see it. if a because as i described to him as see
of the person our business. 0k, not the business of the person involved our business. 0k, not the business of the person involved and - our business. 0k, not the business of the person involved and his - of the person involved and his family, and as i said, his conscience, because none of it was on bbc property and the, looks like he has not broken the law. is debatable, some of the accusations made involve lawbreaking. mat debatable, some of the accusations made involve lawbreaking. .. made involve lawbreaking. not yet, if at all. made involve lawbreaking. not yet, if at all- as made involve lawbreaking. not yet, if at all- as it made involve lawbreaking. not yet, if at all. as it stands made involve lawbreaking. not yet, if at all. as it stands currently. - if at all. as it stands currently. goal as it stands currently, the accusations potentially could lead to a situation where the law was broken. has a right to anonymity by the laws in that case. i m interested in your vi
al tansley has the 5 live news. the unnamed bbc presenter who is said to have paid a teenagerfor explicit photos is facing more allegations this morning. the radio 2 presenter jeremy vine has called on the individual to name himself, saying the new allegations mean vitrol could be thrown at innocent colleagues . g7 leaders are set to sign a long term security pact with ukraine today. the president of the european commission, ursula von der leyen, says the group is determined to uphold international law in the face of russian aggression. executives from thames water will face questions from mps this morning. they re expected to be asked how the company racked up debts of more than £14 billion, while sewage continued to be discharged thousands of times a year. and scientists in australia say they ve created a kind of biodegradable glue that could be used to restore coral reefs. they hope it might help repair the great barrier reef one day but they say it will be hard to apply over a