Mr. Chairman. What purpose ir trying the last word. The gentleman strikes the lastem word. Recognized. Thank you. I yield to the rankingst member just real quickly, the gent thely lady from california stat something irn addressed head on last night. Undersecretary haleig said it w perspective money, not interfering or dealing with the issue. For those of us who have been in a war zone people do die. This money did not stop that. That is something that cannot be continuedme to perpetrated on ts world. Reclaiming my time. Theec difference in the Clinton Impeachment and this one, president clinton committed a crime, perjury, this president isnt accused of committing a crime. The constitution is prettymi clr on what constitution impeachable offense, treason, bribery and other High Crimes And Misdemeanors. Its not treason, bribery, other High Crimes And Misdemeanors and adam schiff an nancy pelosi deem impeachable. No president should abuse the
powers of his or her office like the chairman
question. ti i think in terms ofin the workforce, there s terms a s of denial going on. i think there has been i on the military for a long time. generally, pilots don t report toese thingspilots. when they do, people don t want to hear it. they don t want to talk about itt want . ants nobody wants to engage on this topic. however, it is also clear that at least at the senior level, there has been more investigation, there is more information that has beene e is mor led on. su there was discussion of subpoenas todabpy. i think that s appropriate in this context. we learned today that withholding satellite imagery, for example, which we existedknw because president trump s director of national existedlige intelligence acknowledged that we have that here we are yearseh later, that still hasn t been shared with congress. so there s an example of critically important information, but it showically t for insights that s not being shared. sure. but it s now c bu s not just ufo. technology. t
you guys all hanging out with your high school friends after this? i didn t think so. s question, who told you something that you didn t reall want to hear or even fired you when you were young, but now yo realize that they were right. molly? i have been fire. i think it s a good experience that people should go through i always ends up being something better after it happens it s no an invitation to anybody right now, but i can t say i thought they were right, but it helped me redirect my energies and get a different mindset. i ve been fired three times so i think it s true. usually the firing is directed at you because you re better than they are. that s what i learned. i agree completely. better than they are. too big for this place, i ve go to get out of here. you re fired, i knew it. tyrus, something that was told
communication style is reticent as well as his action. so take positions behind the scene and then tell people later. he likes to take his time, not to be rushed and is described as being very stubborn and i think a lot of people here in germany and a lot of politicians, even people within his governing coalition are asking questions, why is he being so reticent. we can only theorise because he s not telling us. one reason is if you look at the polls in germany, germany is quite split about whether fighting tanks should be spent. over the past 11 months germany has sent a lot of equipment, aid in second biggest giver of the military and humanitarian aid after the us. they are doing a lot but when it comes to certain bits of equipment including fighting tanks, it is incredibly controversial and a lot of people here are nervous because they might view it as an s question of the war. a lot of people also criticised olaf scholz for being reticent. so what people assume is that he s looking
senior cabinet level government officials. the constitution allows the vice president and majority of the cabinet to remove the president if the president is unable to perform his duties. s question is did the 25th a amendment come up? i don t think people should get too excited here. you don t know what they re providing to the committee and are they still trump insiders defending or protecting the president but it is significant. there are reports going back to last year about cabinet officials really huddling and discussing whether they should invoke the 25th amendment in the hours after the unrest began at the capitol. you can t help but this so much of this goes back to the testimony of cassidy hutchinson. she seemed to open the flood gates to all of these higher level male officials. she had much more to lose than