i know what you thinking. kat, that has numbers in it. ew, gross. if i cared about triple digit numbers, i look at ratings for cnn. [laughter] but if this law goes away, it could destroy the internet as we know it. but don t worry, joey. porn will still be available, so you won t lose her second job. get it? you thought i was saying he likes porn, but i m saying he is in porn. thank you for your service. [laughter] so, this week the supreme court heard two cases from families who lost loved ones in terrorist attacks, and those families are suing social media companies, alleging they should be held liable for helping isis. when case involved the 2015 paris attacks. it argued that youtube s algorithms recommended isis propaganda to users. the other case claimed twitter gave isis assistance and didn t do enough to police them from sharing content. and that is where section 230 comes in. it is a short law written in 1996 that is said to have created the internet. it goes like t
stand on the side of terrorists. even if the fear of further lawsuits sent mark zuckerberg fleeing to his home planet. [laughter] imagine how pissed off he would look [laughter] and for reference, here he is having sex. [laughter] but changing this law would open the door for censoring things other than terrorism, too. and once that door is open, it ll be harder to close and don lemons mouth. [laughter] think about it. it s not like isis content gets through because big tech people love isis. of course they don t. isis isn t vegan. [laughter] and they don t wear hoodies to work. it s because companies can t catch everything that everyone is posting all of the time. otherwise they would be sending a s.w.a.t. team after every creep in my comment section.