As capitalism continues to fuel the planetary crisis, David Barkin and Brian M. Napoletano propose that the communitarian revolutionary subject is already…
Are the real questions not eternal and almost all answers provisional?
It is easy to formulate questions, isn’t it? Children love it, philosophers love it – don’t they? Does this suggest there is a deep connection between philosophers and children? What could it be? That both like to be amazed maybe? That they find the world amazing? That they try to look at the world as new, or to the old world afresh, as flabbergasting, full of questions and questionable things? Aren’t questions the best way to express awe? however, philosophers, in contrast to children, tend to give nothing but answers, don’t they? Aren’t many questions in fact rhetorical questions, that contain the answer in themselves? Asking the question is responding it, isn’t it? If every answer can be turned into a question, then every question can be turned into an answer, or not? But then, the real big questions, all of them childish, don’t seem to have an definitive answer, do they? Why do we live? Where