ungagable human being that any person could imagine, what you would come up with is roger jason stone jr. he is a fire hose of words and i would imagine that if this judge moves forward, with what she seems to be indicating she wants to do, is impose a gag order, she ll have quite a battle trying to enforce that with this particular defendant. barbara, one more for you, before i come up to daniel. what are you telling your client if you re client is roger stone? for that matter, what are you telling your client if your client is the president of the united states? most lawyers would tell their client not to talk about charges. you might say something and later decide strategically, you want to take a different tact. and it can be very harmful to your case to say things when you don t have to. most lawyers would say that, now, when you are the president, or maybe even roger stone, i
go there, and it looks like a real stalemate. barbara, i have to ask you about a point that roger stone made that has been dangling out there all week, that is in your bailiwick, he says he was never given his miranda rights. not mirandizing someone you are arresting, if it s correct that there were 26 officers on that raid, show up at the front door with a battering ram, they know they ve got media in the front yard. failure to mirandize would be a big deal, some people straight up don t believe his contention. actually, miranda warnings only kick in if you re going to interrogate a suspect. and so if they didn t mirandize him, and they didn t ask him any questions, that wouldn t be a problem at all. the remedy for failing to mirandize someone is that their statements to the officers then become inadmissible at trial. if there was no questioning or
there s a documentary about me. also by the way, i m raising money via these appearances for my legal defense fund? i think what she s likely to say is he can talk about things outside the scope of the case. the first amendment requires that if you re going to prohibit speech, it has to be narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling governmental interest. i think that she could say, you can talk about anything under the sun, she even said today, you can talk about foreign relations, immigration or tom brady. you can t talk about your trial. i think he can talk about other things, just not his case. i knew the guy years ago here in new york, you have spent a lot more time with him, and a lot more recently, is there a perhaps wounded or scared inner roger stone? or is there just one layer, what you see is what you get and this is our roger stone? if you could go into a laboratory, pull out a petrie dish and create the most
there s no question at this point he s had his opportunity. after she spoke those words, roger stone made media appearances, including showing up on fox news tonight to talk about the possibility of a gag order. the whole purpose of the gag would be so i don t poison a potential jury pool. they just poisoned a potential jury pool by making me look like el chapo. there s also this, a video roger stone posted on youtube this week, detailing how a gentleman should dress for an arraignment in federal court. you have to think long and hard how you re going to dress for your arraignment in federal court. you can t ever really do this in a double breasted suit. it doesn t ride up properly. this is called a windsor collar
journalist. good evening to all of you, barbara, i have to start with you, it is a tour of clothing. at one point he also mentions how poor he is, when talking about the age of all of these items. add all of it up, it can t go over well with a businesslike law and order federal judge. that s right. i m not surprised to see the judge suggest the idea of a gag order. in normal cases that don t get a lot of attention, that would be normal. in high profile cases, the judge has the discretion to implement a gag order, from preventing the defendant from getting a fair trial. she may be trying to save roger stone from himself. making all these statements and tainting a jury pool that will come in later and have to pass judgment on him. so i think that she has asked the parties to state if they have any objection and why. so she ll consider that. it wouldn t surprise me to see her enter a gag order in a case like this. do you think he has a case? this is who i am, this is how i ve become r