criticizing white people who didn t vote for beto. but they will say thank you to folks who were of color tucker: beto o rourke is this white guy with the fake hispanic name running against a hispanic guy named ted, i m too literal for this world, i think. you and me, both. as a democrat, it is incredibly frustrating to watch the party cannibalize itself, because at the end of the day, if you look at this from the health of a democracy, we need multiple parties. we need i.c.e. democrats can t be part of that conversation when we are also far into left field that we are talking about open borders and people have to vote a certain way because of their gender.r. that is really the cost, the consequence, and frankly why republicans should be upset about this, as well, we should t all be concerned when a major party in this country is so unhinged that they are not giving the people a choice. tucker: i think that is a really wise point, and for that
inequality start to rise. tucker: i don t believe that is true, but now they are telling me we really do have to wrap up.y i hope you come back, so we can talk that through. always fun to see you, tucker. tucker: thank you. the left argues consistently that a vote against them was a vote for racism, they have argued that in the last two elections, almost universally. it didn t work, but they areth still arguing it. why is that? we will be right back. douglas! we re running dangerously low on beans. people love your beans, doug. they love em. doooooooooug! you want to go sell some tacos? progressive knows small business makes big demands. doug, where do we get a replacement chili pepper bulb? so we ll design the insurance solution that fits your business. it s a very niche bulb. it s a specialty bulb.
but the opposite has happened. as universal college has become a reality it basically is a reality now, the country has become more stratified. the opposite has happened from what you just said. why? only about a third of people have a college degree, it hasn t become universal at all. tucker: compare that to 30 years ago or 50 years ago, everybody who wants a college degree. educational attainment has stalled out in the country, and i think that is a component why inequality has continued to rise. tucker: are you being serious? c because the country is more equal wait a second. okay. i m sorry, they are telling me i have to wrap. in the 1970s, we saw a dramatic expansion ofe educational attainment, and we had inequality over that time, the middle class is doing a lot better. starting around 1970 to 1975, you see educational attainment stall out, and you see
bureaucracy beneath them. but if you take three steps back, here is what you see. in an administration beset with constant leaks and infighting and people looking out for themselves and only themselves, sessions was maybe one of the very few people who never forgot why he was there, to make america a better country. we can only hope that his replacement will do the same. several pretty extreme democrats got beaten in the polls last night, but some of them won and are set to be fixtures on the national political scene on the other cable channels for years to come. tonight, we begin tracking these people. lisa boothe, senior fellow, she s here with the details. hey, lisa. hey, tucker. how are you? tucker: i m great. 470 different races from house and senate, and it is hard to keep track of a lot of them, so tell us what we should be paying attention to? t one voice that we will hear from a lot is alexandria ocasio-cortez, she won her
borders, that is the wing of the party. which one will win? this is why the ocasio-cortez folks will win. we have dnc chair, tom perez, who says that she is the head of the democratic party, she is the future of the democratic party. we also have obama, who actually endorsed her, as well. tucker: can i say is that because she is impressive or because of the way right, i m not being mean, but she is young and she seems like she doesn t know very much, at all, so i m beginning to think it is only because of race and gender, which is not a good way to make these decisions. because it s irrelevant. of course, but this gets bacs to the philosophical, ideological struggle that is happening with the party right now, and that is this.hi are we going to be a party that tells people you have to vote for a democrat because you are a woman, because you are gay, because the color of your skin is dark, that is one wing of the party. you hear it from people inda texas.