the plan was illegal, or said in in front and trump did not care it was illegal. i think that was one of the biggest take-aways that eastman himself knew it was illegal and put it in an email, i want you to do a minor constitutional violation. chuck, back to you, we will build our way back to donald trump if we, can and specifically about his lawyer, that lawyer, john eastman, we even saw the email that he wrote to golden globe, saying, you know, having to rudy giuliani, saying you know, having thought about it, i think i do need a pardon here that understands his mind set and understanding he had done something criminal, why else would you need a pardon, what are the legal implications to face him? good questions, peter. first on the pardon, i m not a poker player but i m told people who play poker look for tells if they have a good land or a bad hand and a tell, consciousness of guilt, as you articulated would be asking for a pardon, would be asking for a pardo
conway on a new effort to overturn the election. as republicans gather to prepare and launch benghazi style attacks on joe biden, how another one of their phony investigations just collapsed. what about the unmasking of america? why has there been such limited coverage of the flynn on masking? who can believe a thing like? this went all in starts right now. good evening from new york, i m chris hayes, in the one week since the shooting in uvalde, there s been 18 more mass shootings in this country, and tonight we come on the air with news of, another just breaking it was in tulsa oklahoma and saint francis hospital, inside the hospital according to the tulsa police, it started earlier this afternoon asked there have been multiple injuries and three confirmed fatalities, police have also confirmed the shooters death. this evening, the tulsa police captain describe the scene is catastrophic. he said officers were going from florida florida room to room, rescuing peo
hours, i listened to snippets, but i will give all the airtime to hope on this show. let me play this for you, donna edwards, this is eastman, who sort of was the first person to put this into the political conversations about the architecture of the attempted 2020 coup plot to overturn the election and took some folks a long time to call it that, but that s precisely what it was. let me play this. eastman prepared a memo attempting to justify this strategy, which was circulated to the trump white house, rudy giuliani s legal team, and state legislators around the country. and he appeared before the georgia state legislature to advocate for it publicly. you could adopt a slate of electors yourselves and when you add in the mix of the significance sworn affidavits and video evidence of outright
specifically about his lawyer, that lawyer, john eastman, we even saw the email that he wrote to golden globe, saying, you know, having to rudy giuliani, saying you know, having thought about it, i think i do need a pardon here that understands his mind set and understanding he had done something criminal, why else would you need a pardon, what are the legal implications to face him? good questions, peter. first on the pardon, i m not a poker player but i m told people who play poker look for tells if they have a good land or a bad hand and a tell, consciousness of guilt, as you articulated would be asking for a pardon, would be asking for a pardon, i m guessing that jonathan or garrett or you pete ver never asked for a parden in large part because you haven t committed a crime so that is absolute consciousness of guilt. is eastman on the hook for crimes? potentially absolutely. the hardest thing for us to prove as prosecutors is always intent. but here, we now know, eastman didn t
there was a shocking ruling from the judge in a civil case, between john eastman, one of the authors of one of the coup memos. he was trying to prevent the committee from getting hands on his emails, because he was a lawyer, and he says well this stuff was privileged and the judge denied his request and saying it was more likely than not that president trump and dr. is eastman dishonestly conspired to obstruct the joint session of congress. meaning that it was probably criminal and part of the crime fraud ex deception. one of the documents in question, that was forwarded to eastman. the judge ruled that, quote, it was subject to the crime fraud exception, and the court rules it to be disclosed. now the crime fraud exception