they want to support donald because he gives them jobs and he understands the economy and he s in the real world. don t get me started on donald, richard. let s move on. ms. transparency, she takes six months to hand over her server and she pretty much lied about everything. now we find out there s a second company that s backed up this server, and an employee of the first company says there s some shady stuff going on and he s worried about it, and her i.t. person is pleading the fifth. this is dangerous territory, is it not? hillary clinton, jeanine, is out there talking about ways to control costs for health care, for education, for child care. she s talking about voters rights and clean energy. what her political opponents are talking about is benghazi and
completely ignore ambassador steven s pleas for more security for our people in benghazi? why should we trust you with the security of our nation? wow. thanks for the great responses. i always love reading what you guys think. make sure you log on and send me your thoughts on tonight s show. and check out my thoughts on all the news throughout the week. plus great behind the scenes photos. that s it for us tonight. and remember you don t ever have to miss justice. just set your dvr and tell your friends to do the same. thanks for joining us. remember friend me on facebook follow me on twitter @judge jeanine jeanine. see you next week same time same place. and start planning your own.
that can be done to upgrade and build new facilities and to the hire more doctors and to increase the accountability at the v.a., and congress does not act and actually pass these bills, because the responsibility son congress, and the senate tried to pass comprehensive v.a. legislation in february and fill buibustere congress when two said no, and so congress has a responsibility, too, if they don t move forward. and another controversy dogging the white house is benghazi, and hillary clinton s book goes on sale officially next hour but we have been listening for days the highlights, and she has been playing defense on benghazi, but in an a bshgs krshbc interview,t to really a next level of her own explanation, and let me play that. actually, it is more of a reason to run, because i do not believe our great country should be playing minor league ball.
happened in benghazi. however, if you re dinesh d souza, you have to expect that the government will be looking at you. he broke the law. i don t know that he broke the law. there s an indictment. his attorney said he did not. so if the scales of justice are equal, then he has a chance to defend himself. he does have a chance to defend himself. i m not sure that the this really just got released just a couple minutes before the show. i m not sure he said he didn t break the law. he said there was no quid pro quo. so he may have broken the law, but it wasn t can i make a point, though? yes. whether he broke the law or not will be decided later. you have to look at the context of the last year or so between this, the irs, foa, cuomo, the message is clear, tolerant will no longer tolerate dissent. the tide is turning against them and they re getting nervous and
i wonder. bob, could you imagine if the doj went after, i don t know, the fast and furious, benghazi, irs, with the same veracity they seem to be going after a filmmaker? it would never be enough veracity for you. but this case is one of pure simple greed and taking money from lobbyists. those are facts. if you read the indictments against this man, he s a guy, purportedly, now, who took money from friends to direct it to somebody who was his, to the tune of $20,000. that s blatantly illegal. you can argue he was picked out, but when you say $20,000 to an unwinnable candidate, and he gets people directing money, he has broken the law. dana, i believe his attorney made a statement saying there was no quid pro quo. we know how this administration feels about preblthding the rights of filmmakers. we still have one in jail who was falsely accused of creating the terrorism attack that