membership can t happen, but they made real progress and the alliance will lay out the further reforms, both in terms of their security work and their democracy that are necessary to keep moving down that path. elizabeth, how do you weigh nato s clear desire to protect ukraine but also try not to antagonize putin to the point where he may do something extreme? well, that seems to be what is the debate is focusing on a lot. the point we re missing is whether it is in ukraine s and nato s best interest, irregardless of the response by russia, for us to ukraine on a specific and clear path toward membership. from the ukraine perspective, we know there is very strong interest, i think there would be a big morale boost to be saying, yes, when the war is over, you will be on a path and here is the criteria and here is how it will work and there are a number of nato members who are interested in that. i think if we re considering now, we re not in the position where we were in 2008 when n
it before there is any ai, absolutely stop and think about it before there is any further- it before there is any further forward it before there is any further forward movement. - it before there is any further. forward movement. personally, it before there is any further- forward movement. personally, i believe forward movement. personally, i believe the forward movement. personally, i believe the greatest forward movement. personally, i believe the greatest threat - forward movement. personally, i believe the greatest threat to - believe the greatest threat to mankind believe the greatest threat to mankind is believe the greatest threat to mankind is climate believe the greatest threat to mankind is climate change, l believe the greatest threat to l mankind is climate change, but believe the greatest threat to - mankind is climate change, but that aside, mankind is climate change, but that aside, it mankind is climate change, but that aside, it looks mankind is c