deliberations. the islamic revolutionary guard corps the para revolution this week and fired a dozen missiles into northern iraq, some landed near eight u.s. consulate building there, the ir gc said had had targeted an israeli facility to retaliate for a strike in syria. price refused to comment on weather the united states would move the terrorist exit nation against the irg c parade heat and stand if ended the administration s efforts to provide a nuclear agreement wit iran. every challenge that we face and would face from iraq, the ballistic missile programs, all of those challenges would becom all the more difficult to confront if iran was in the possession of a nuclear weapon. officials say the irg c is threatening former secretary of
they have protested, spoken out they have said they want a better life. i think our main focus is on the iranian regime as well as the irg c specifically and i think that they have to make a decision. at the end of the day, we can t allow them to have any nuclear program. bret: at the same time in syria the same times is coming like to a head. what is the latest? is there a fee or chemical weapons are going to be used? do you really believe that s heading down that road? we ve had three meetings in the security council on syria alone and one was by all the members of the security council trying to ask about what was going to happen because we all heard the rumors of chemical weapons. we saw the actions where they claim it s the white helmets or the other volunteers that are getting ready to stage some attacks when they actually do i it. the sternest warnings came down from most members of the security council telling them that s not just chemical weapons would be addressed by the
they could be impose sanctions that violate the deal and the u.s. would not be in compliance. what they could do and probably would be smarter is to target the irg c with sanctions. ballistic missiles with more sanctions, things that don t violate the deal the show that they are tough on the iranian regime. it would be the responsible thing to do and you know who the person is is going to be in charge of this process back bob corker. the chair of the senate foreign relations committee. he has been the one leading the effort on the iran deal on the republican side and i just have to think and wonder how the last few weeks the president s feud with corker is going to play into this if at all. because pulling out of the deal without any sing to replace it. when you re making an argument of some man is not going to happen. marie: congress take steps to pull the u.s. out of the deal which they can do. some congress never directly talking about doing that. if they do that without a way to