Page 9 - Iqvia Inc News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The Supreme Court recently declined to review the Seventh Circuit’s ruling in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, 582 US (2017) did not apply to class actions and therefore that a federal court in Illinois somehow had specific personal jurisdiction over the individual claims of unnamed class members who had no connection whatsoever to that forum state. In Bristol-Myers, the Supreme Court held that federal courts do not have specific personal jurisdiction over the nonresidents’ claims merely because resident plaintiffs “allegedly sustained the same injuries as did the nonresidents.” The defendant in Mussat argued that the holding in Bristol-Myers (a mass action) should apply with equal force to its case (a class action). As our regular readers know, this argument makes abundant sense but has seen varying levels of success. In

United statesIqvia incSupreme courtFaegre drinker biddle reathBristol myers squibb coFaegre drinker biddleSeventh circuitBristol myers squibbRules enabling actஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்உச்ச நீதிமன்றம்பிரிஸ்டல் மைஸ் ஸ்க்விப்ப் இணைஏழாவது சுற்றுபிரிஸ்டல் மைஸ் ஸ்க்விப்ப்விதிகள் செயல்படுத்துகிறது நாடகம்