family so that they, like other iowa farmers, would not be exposed to the harshness of capitalism. we ve actually spent several days trying to find out what joni ernst s position is on farm subsidies and whether she or her family has ever been a beneficiary of farm subsidies. and she and her campaign have refused to answer those questions. when iowa politicians talk about socialism or cutting wasteful spending or cutting wasteful socialistic spending, they are usually not talking about agriculture subsidies, even though they are wasteful socialistic spending. america has good and bad socialism, and agriculture subsidies are very bad socialism, but it is socialism that iowa loves. over 80% of iowa farms partake of that particular brand of government pork, which usually leaves iowa ranking number two in terms of amount of socialistic agriculture subsidies obtained from the
joni ernst s position is on farm subsidies and whether she or her family has ever been a beneficiary of farm subsidies. and she and her campaign have refused to answer those questions. when iowa politicians talk about socialism or cutting wasteful spending or cutting wasteful socialistic spending, they are usually not talking about agriculture subsidies, even though they are wasteful socialistic spending. america has good and bad socialism, and agriculture subsidies are very bad socialism, but it is socialism that iowa loves. over 80% of iowa farms partake of that particular brand of government pork, which usually leaves iowa ranking number two in terms of amount of socialistic agriculture subsidies obtained from the dreaded federal government. now, you would think that the more socialist-friendly state of california would be the highest recipient of agricultural subsidies because it is by far the biggest agricultural state