It is inefficient and ineffective for military and general sublive i would like to bring us home to my state. Obviously we have the port that dates back to world war ii in terms of some of its buildings and we have temporary military construction dating back to that time and we are in an aggressive up dating of that facility which is such a key facility for our army and i notice that they even have the nerve to put military construction and to these at aces in the United States in the overseas Contingency Operating funds paid can you comment about how this impacts your ability on readiness and training when you are being put in a fund yeartoyear and not certain and you cant plan with it . Sure senator. You are exactly right you cant plan with it and you cant just go yeartoyear and things like multiyear contracts and having relationships with industries to upgrade your weapons and equipment etc. Specifically what you are talking about is infrastructure which is a key component. We have
Scott rasmussen and john johnson. These are likely voters, its a big shift from the prior polling. Six point shift. Thats a pretty big move. The twoway race is a sixpoint race. I think that means there is a lot of people who, if you force them to pick between donald trump and Hillary Clinton, theyre saying ill go with hillary, but when you give them other options, theyre not quite sold yet. Big story here when i was here on monday, the trend was moving in Donald Trumps direction. Since the debate, moving the other way. Charles john, no doubt about it, other parts of the poll may underscore whats going on here, i think particularly if im on the donald trump camp temperament, Hillary Clinton gets a 67 nod on that, donald trump only 37 . He is beating her when it comes to the economy and government corruption, something everyone is upset about but you have to wonder could those be enough to sort of retake this momentum that scott talked about . Right, it presents a real problem for donald
Scott rasmussen and john johnson. These are likely voters, its a big shift from the prior polling. Six point shift. Thats a pretty big move. The twoway race is a sixpoint race. I think that means there is a lot of people who, if you force them to pick between donald trump and Hillary Clinton, theyre saying ill go with hillary, but when you give them other options, theyre not quite sold yet. Big story here when i was here on monday, the trend was moving in Donald Trumps direction. Since the debate, moving the other way. Charles john, no doubt about it, other parts of the poll may underscore whats going on here, i think particularly if im on the donald trump camp temperament, Hillary Clinton gets a 67 nod on that, donald trump only 37 . He is beating her when it comes to the economy and government corruption, something everyone is upset about but you have to wonder could those be enough to sort of retake this momentum that scott talked about . Right, it presents a real problem for donald
Development and look at the root causes of immigration. The new plant will offer lifelines for those who would otherwise be pushed to take dangerous journeys in such for a better life. It has to be done. [applause]. As much as we invest in improving conditions we also need to invest in responding to humanitarian crisis. More than anything, we need to invest in our young people. I cannot. [inaudible] to youth unemployment. [applause]. I will not accept that the generation y might be the first generation that could be poor than their parents. Of course this is attack the European Union can support this effort. In their efforts. We are doing this with the European Youth council that was launched three years ago. The commission in the house, the effectiveness on step up the guarantee. More than 9 million young people got a job because of the European Union. We will continue improving the skill set of europeans in reaching out to the regions and people most in need. The European Union can a
On gaining information into the brexit exit. So youre very welcome, i know this is your second gig in two days and that you have told the house of the European Union yesterday on it was a particular pleasure. Which i hope to repeat today. Is that the reason you chose to sit at that end of the building . I did not even do the scheduling. Between your clocks in my office. I dont imagine it was with our clocks. You made some pen a decision to go there first. But that is the general hook that i want to take into my next question which is to examine your assessment of the legal and parliamentary implications of the brexit. Can we confirm that there is going to have to be an actual act in order to leave the European Union . There there has to be some legislation, no doubt about that. There are various stages, firstly with dealing with the European Community in 1972 and all the consequential legislation after that. There mayor may well have to be parliamentary under the relevant 2010 legislat