Live tweeting and youtube videos and small streams. Tech is playing a major role in the demands for justice and peace. And a c. E. O. Is leading the charge in every way. To our lead story as violent protests rock the streets, technology is everywhere. Many demonstrators protesting the shooting of Michael Brown and organizing their marches through facebook and giving the people instant details on what is happening on the ground through ferguson. One of those is a native of st. Louis and he has been posting tweets that is going on. Lets bring in the c. E. O. Who is in new york via skype. And max, let me start with you, the role is very interesting because we are not just seeing vines or youtube videos but what is happening as it is happening based on your site. What does that look like from the inside . We had Radio Stations that filmed some music concerts and realized that they could actually go out there and use that equipment and broadcast live to millions. Live streaming isnt just ta
Missouri. What about when stories are too sensitive . Of theas been removed beheading of a journalist by militants. Twitter said this is the latest example of social Media Companies policing from open internet policy many have embraced for years. I spoke with courtney radish, david kirkpatrick, and a law professor. Was iis, hadar asked if there were any legal issues for social Media Companies policing user posts. Is the firstpoint amendment which guarantees free speech as a fundamental right. Over the years where it has been litigation, mostly focused on video for children and the like and not so much on what happens in a real news. The freedom of speech is kurt held mostly on sex curtailed mostly on sex but theres a lot less litigation on a violence and in recent weeks, web and flooded with images from around the world. Does the last series of images and we have seen from gaza and the ukraine and all of these raise issues that have not been extensively litigated. Not necessarily illeg
Different now we dont see them deft from retail use so thats why we are recommending citywide. So i heard that the maker of the motion was amenable to the secondary. Depends on how you phrase the recommendation. As i heard the motion it is to dpaupt a recommendation for approval as amended to limit the amendment for only the upper Market Street and ct with the recommendation to the board to expand it citywide and to continue the discussion for possible citywide im more comfortable with the openended type of im sorry to continue the discussions. To consider a thats correct its a different meaning and seeing the discussion of the legislation. Commissioner johnson. Thanks i know yeah, that gets us there before now we were talking about the use of words analysis that is specific important the Planning Department it is not necessary if we didnt pass it today theres no analysis so i agree that it one thing about the motion it sounds like if we are recommending supervisor wieners legislation
Neighborhood commercial districts rules for certain neighborhood and i feel im kind of jumping offer what it constitutes to the appropriate supervisors as well as to the neighborhood organizations for forms who are involved i feel i can support supervisor wieners legislation for the upper market but i dont want to broadly endorse it for everything else. Commissioner antonini. Ill agree with commissioner moore this might be beneficial citywide but a jump maybe we should ask for today what is being asked we the supervisor what the supermarket will provide arcades on the first or second floor and other entertainment use i will make a motion to approve that with that being the action were taking. Second. If i could intersect i think we should look at more comprehensive things i know its the right move to signify approval for upper market but dont need every entities to come back for the legislation of the cd i dont want to jump to citywide with the public or the staff with those. Commissio
District. I understand but it needs to be an official way to say a citywide question would be fine. My pd is that the commission would like there to be more analysis to do this citywide and asking the supervisors in reality the supervisors b will ask us to do the analysis but it is also engaging their personal preference of what they want to include it i see no harm in making the recommendations to the board it to engage their preferences and incorporate such analysis if necessary into our work. Ive worded it that captures that spirit. Commissioner moore if i may this requires a different discussion i want to see the department that recommended this in the first place i cant decide on the recommendation and Diego Sanchez we believe that the arresting cascades mechanic devices the existing controls over threequarters of the mcd were based on on the uses of the 1980s it is changed we see those at low impact Recreational Use we see that the community that span metropolitan regions are for